Suppr超能文献

ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌的三联疗法:多学科团队决策制定与功能的基准评估

Trimodality therapy for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: benchmarking multi-disciplinary team decision-making and function.

作者信息

Dickhoff C, Hartemink K J, van de Ven P M, van Reij E J F, Senan S, Paul M A, Smit E F, Dahele M

机构信息

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2014 Aug;85(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although the standard treatment for patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy, some patients are considered for trimodality therapy [TT]. We analyzed outcomes for stage IIIA NSCLC, treated with TT and compared them with concurrent chemoradiotherapy [con-CRT].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated between January 2007 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Not included were patients with sulcus superior tumors, unknown T/N-status, or recurrent disease after con-CRT followed by surgery. All patients were discussed at our multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board (MTB).

RESULTS

Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2 for TT and con-CRT patients. TT patients were younger (median TT=56 years vs. con-CRT=62 years; p=0.001) and had less advanced cN-stage (TT cN2=41% vs. 83% for CRT; p<0.001). 44% of TT patients had T4-stage vs. 12% of con-CRT patients. Median RT dose was lower for TT (50 Gy vs. 66 Gy; p=0.001) and median RT planning target volume (PTV) in TT and con-CRT patients was 525 cm(3) and 655 cm(3) (p=0.010), respectively. The majority of TT patients had a lobectomy (23/32). Median follow-up was 30.3 months (95% CI=18.7-41.9) for TT and 51 months (95% CI=24.9-77.4) for con-CRT. Median overall survival was not reached for TT and was 18.6 months (95% CI=12.8-24.4) for con-CRT (p=0.001). For PTV</≥500 cm(3), median OS for TT was not reached/33.9 months and 29.1/17.1 months for con-CRT. TT patients with cN0/1 had better survival than those receiving con-CRT (p=0.015), but those with cN2 did not (p=0.158). The 90-day mortality from start of RT was 0% (0/32) for TT and 1.7% (1/58) for con-CRT. 90-day post-operative mortality for TT was 3.1% (1/32, event unrelated to TT).

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients with IIIA NSCLC treated with TT had favorable long-term survival with acceptable short-term mortality. These outcomes support the decision-making and function of our MTB/treatment team. The role of TT in cN2 disease and large tumors merits further evaluation.

摘要

目的

虽然ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗是放化疗,但部分患者可考虑接受三联疗法[TT]。我们分析了接受TT治疗的ⅢA期NSCLC患者的结局,并将其与同步放化疗[同步CRT]进行比较。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2007年1月至2011年12月期间接受治疗的患者。排除肺上沟肿瘤、T/N分期不明或同步CRT后手术复发的患者。所有患者均在我们的多学科胸部肿瘤委员会(MTB)进行讨论。

结果

TT组和同步CRT组患者的平均查尔森合并症指数均为2。TT组患者更年轻(TT组中位数年龄=56岁,同步CRT组=62岁;p=0.001),且cN分期较晚的患者较少(TT组cN2=41%,CRT组为83%;p<0.001)。44%的TT组患者为T4期,而同步CRT组患者为12%。TT组的中位放疗剂量较低(50 Gy vs. 66 Gy;p=0.001),TT组和同步CRT组患者的中位放疗计划靶体积(PTV)分别为525 cm³和655 cm³(p=0.010)。大多数TT组患者接受了肺叶切除术(23/32)。TT组的中位随访时间为30.3个月(95%CI=18.7-41.9),同步CRT组为51个月(95%CI=24.9-77.4)。TT组未达到中位总生存期,同步CRT组为18.6个月(95%CI=12.8-24.4)(p=0.001)。对于PTV</≥500 cm³,TT组未达到中位总生存期/为33.9个月,同步CRT组为29.1/17.1个月。cN0/1的TT组患者的生存期优于接受同步CRT的患者(p=0.015),但cN2的患者则不然(p=0.158)。从放疗开始起90天的死亡率,TT组为0%(0/32),同步CRT组为1.7%(1/58)。TT组术后90天死亡率为3.1%(1/32,事件与TT无关)。

结论

选择接受TT治疗的ⅢA期NSCLC患者具有良好的长期生存率和可接受的短期死亡率。这些结果支持了我们MTB/治疗团队的决策制定和功能。TT在cN2疾病和大肿瘤中的作用值得进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验