Suppr超能文献

干细胞移植后的身体成分:生物电阻抗与空气置换体积描记法的比较

Body composition following stem cell transplant: comparison of bioimpedance and air-displacement plethysmography.

作者信息

Hung Yun-Chi, Bauer Judith D, Horsely Pamela, Ward Leigh C, Bashford John, Isenring Elisabeth A

机构信息

Centre for Dietetics Research, School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Centre for Dietetics Research, School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; The Wesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrition. 2014 Sep;30(9):1000-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between detected changes in body composition determined by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) among patients with cancer undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT); and to assess the agreement of absolute values of BIS with ADP and dual energy x-ray (DXA).

METHODS

Forty-four adult hematologic cancer patients undergoing PBSCT completed both BIS and ADP assessment at preadmission and at 3 mo after transplantation. A subsample (n = 11) was assessed by DXA at 3 mo after transplantation. Results were examined for the BIS instrument's default setting and three alternative predictive equations from the literature. Agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman limits of agreement analysis while correlation was examined using the Lin's concordance correlation.

RESULTS

Changes in body composition parameters assessed by BIS were comparable with those determined by ADP regardless of the predictive equations used. Bias of change in fat-free mass was clinically acceptable (all <1 kg), although limits of agreement were wide (more than ±6 kg). Overall, the BIS predictive equation accounting for body mass index performed the best. Absolute body composition parameters predicted by the alternative predictive equations agreed with DXA and ADP better than the BIS instrument's default setting.

CONCLUSION

Changes predicted by BIS were similar to those determined by ADP on a group level; however, agreement of predicted changes at an individual level should be interpreted with caution due to wide limits of agreement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估接受外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT)的癌症患者中,生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)和空气置换体积描记法(ADP)所测定的身体成分变化之间的一致性;并评估BIS绝对值与ADP及双能X线吸收法(DXA)的一致性。

方法

44例接受PBSCT的成年血液系统癌症患者在入院前及移植后3个月完成了BIS和ADP评估。11例患者的子样本在移植后3个月接受了DXA评估。对BIS仪器的默认设置以及文献中的三个替代预测方程的结果进行了检查。通过Bland-Altman一致性界限分析评估一致性,同时使用Lin一致性相关分析检查相关性。

结果

无论使用何种预测方程,BIS评估的身体成分参数变化与ADP测定的变化相当。去脂体重变化的偏差在临床上是可接受的(均<1 kg),尽管一致性界限较宽(超过±6 kg)。总体而言,考虑体重指数的BIS预测方程表现最佳。替代预测方程预测的绝对身体成分参数与DXA和ADP的一致性优于BIS仪器的默认设置。

结论

BIS预测的变化在组水平上与ADP测定的变化相似;然而,由于一致性界限较宽,个体水平上预测变化的一致性应谨慎解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验