Bandorski Dirk, Schmitt Jörn, Kurzlechner Claudia, Erkapic Damir, Hamm Christian W, Seeger Werner, Ghofrani Ardeschir, Höltgen Reinhard, Gall Henning
The German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre (UGMLC), Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Medical Clinic 1, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany ; Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Benekestrasse 2-8, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:617565. doi: 10.1155/2014/617565. Epub 2014 May 26.
Few studies have investigated patients with pulmonary hypertension and arrhythmias. Data on electrophysiological studies in these patients are rare. In a retrospective dual-centre design, we analysed data from patients with indications for electrophysiological study. Fifty-five patients with pulmonary hypertension were included (Dana Point Classification: group 1: 14, group 2: 23, group 3: 4, group 4: 8, group 5: 2, and 4 patients with exercised-induced pulmonary hypertension). Clinical data, 6-minute walk distance, laboratory values, and echocardiography were collected/performed. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was the most frequent indication (n = 15) for an electrophysiological study, followed by atrial flutter (n = 14). In summary 36 ablations were performed and 25 of them were successful (atrial flutter 12 of 14 and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia 4 of 4). Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 14.4 minutes. Electrophysiological studies in patients with pulmonary hypertension are feasible and safe. Ablation procedures are as effective in these patients as in non-PAH patients with atrial flutter and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and should be performed likewise. The prognostic relevance of ventricular stimulations and inducible ventricular tachycardias in these patients is still unclear and requires further investigation.
很少有研究调查过患有肺动脉高压和心律失常的患者。关于这些患者电生理研究的数据很少。在一项回顾性双中心设计中,我们分析了有进行电生理研究指征的患者的数据。纳入了55例肺动脉高压患者(达纳点分类:1组:14例,2组:23例,3组:4例,4组:8例,5组:2例,以及4例运动诱发的肺动脉高压患者)。收集/进行了临床数据、6分钟步行距离、实验室检查值和超声心动图检查。非持续性室性心动过速是进行电生理研究最常见的指征(n = 15),其次是心房扑动(n = 14)。总之,进行了36次消融,其中25次成功(心房扑动14例中的12例,房室结折返性心动过速4例中的4例)。透视时间为16±14.4分钟。对肺动脉高压患者进行电生理研究是可行且安全的。消融手术在这些患者中与在非肺动脉高压的心房扑动和房室结折返性心动过速患者中一样有效,应同样进行。这些患者中室性刺激和可诱发室性心动过速的预后相关性仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。