• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚靶控输注模型在肥胖患者中的性能:药代动力学和药效学分析。

Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.

作者信息

Cortínez Luis I, De la Fuente Natalia, Eleveld Douglas J, Oliveros Ana, Crovari Fernando, Sepulveda Pablo, Ibacache Mauricio, Solari Sandra

机构信息

From the Departmento de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Departmento de Cirugía, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Departamento de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo; and Departmento de Laboratorio Clínico, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):302-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.

DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317
PMID:24977639
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with important physiologic changes that can potentially affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of anesthetic drugs. We designed this study to assess the predictive performance of 5 currently available propofol PK models in morbidly obese patients and to characterize the Bispectral Index (BIS) response in this population.

METHODS

Twenty obese patients (body mass index >35 kg/m), aged 20 to 60 years, scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery, were studied. Anesthesia was administered using propofol by target-controlled infusion and remifentanil by manually controlled infusion. BIS data and propofol infusion schemes were recorded. Arterial blood samples to measure propofol were collected during induction, maintenance, and the first 2 postoperative hours. Median performance errors (MDPEs) and median absolute performance errors (MDAPEs) were calculated to measure model performance. A PKPD model was developed using NONMEM to characterize the propofol concentration-BIS dynamic relationship in the presence of remifentanil.

RESULTS

We studied 20 obese adults (mean weight: 106 kg, range: 85-141 kg; mean age: 33.7 years, range: 21-53 years; mean body mass index: 41.4 kg/m, range: 35-52 kg/m). We obtained 294 arterial samples and analyzed 1431 measured BIS values. When total body weight (TBW) was used as input of patient weight, the Eleveld allometric model showed the best (P < 0.0001) performance with MDPE = 18.2% and MDAPE = 27.5%. The 5 tested PK models, however, showed a tendency to underestimate propofol concentrations. The use of an adjusted body weight with the Schnider and Marsh models improved the performance of both models achieving the lowest predictive errors (MDPE = <10% and MDAPE = <25%; all P < 0.0001). A 3-compartment PK model linked to a sigmoidal inhibitory Emax PD model by a first-order rate constant (ke0) adequately described the propofol concentration-BIS data. A lag time parameter of 0.44 minutes (SE = 0.04 minutes) to account for the delay in BIS response improved the fit. A simulated effect-site target of 3.2 μg/mL (SE = 0.17 μg/mL) was estimated to obtain BIS of 50, in the presence of remifentanil, for a typical patient in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

The Eleveld allometric PK model proved to be superior to all other tested models using TBW. All models, however, showed a trend to underestimate propofol concentrations. The use of adjusted body weight instead of TBW with the traditional Schnider and Marsh models markedly improved their performance achieving the lowest predictive errors of all tested models. Our results suggest no relevant effect of obesity on both the time profile of BIS response and the propofol concentration-BIS relationship.

摘要

背景

肥胖与重要的生理变化相关,这些变化可能会影响麻醉药物的药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)特征。我们设计了这项研究,以评估5种目前可用的丙泊酚PK模型在病态肥胖患者中的预测性能,并描述该人群中的脑电双频指数(BIS)反应。

方法

研究了20例年龄在20至60岁之间、计划进行腹腔镜减肥手术的肥胖患者(体重指数>35kg/m²)。使用丙泊酚靶控输注和瑞芬太尼手动控制输注进行麻醉。记录BIS数据和丙泊酚输注方案。在诱导期、维持期以及术后前2小时采集动脉血样以测量丙泊酚浓度。计算中位性能误差(MDPE)和中位绝对性能误差(MDAPE)以评估模型性能。使用NONMEM开发了一个PKPD模型,以描述在瑞芬太尼存在的情况下丙泊酚浓度与BIS的动态关系。

结果

我们研究了20例肥胖成年人(平均体重:106kg,范围:85 - 141kg;平均年龄:33.7岁,范围:21 - 53岁;平均体重指数:41.4kg/m²,范围:35 - 52kg/m²)。我们获得了294份动脉血样并分析了1431个测量的BIS值。当使用总体重(TBW)作为患者体重输入时,Eleveld异速生长模型表现最佳(P < 0.0001),MDPE = 18.2%,MDAPE = 27.5%。然而,5个测试的PK模型均显示出低估丙泊酚浓度的趋势。使用调整体重结合Schnider和Marsh模型可改善这两个模型的性能,使其达到最低预测误差(MDPE = <10%,MDAPE = <25%;所有P < 0.0001)。一个通过一阶速率常数(ke0)与S形抑制性Emax PD模型相连的三室PK模型充分描述了丙泊酚浓度 - BIS数据。一个0.44分钟(SE = 0.04分钟)的延迟时间参数用于解释BIS反应的延迟,改善了拟合效果。在我们的研究中,对于典型患者,在有瑞芬太尼存在的情况下,估计效应室靶浓度为3.2μg/mL(SE = 0.17μg/mL)时可使BIS达到50。

结论

Eleveld异速生长PK模型在使用TBW时被证明优于所有其他测试模型。然而,所有模型均显示出低估丙泊酚浓度的趋势。使用调整体重而非TBW结合传统的Schnider和Marsh模型显著改善了它们的性能,使其达到所有测试模型中的最低预测误差。我们的结果表明肥胖对BIS反应的时间过程以及丙泊酚浓度 - BIS关系均无显著影响。

相似文献

1
Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.丙泊酚靶控输注模型在肥胖患者中的性能:药代动力学和药效学分析。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):302-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.
2
Effect-Site Target-Controlled Infusion in the Obese: Model Derivation and Performance Assessment.肥胖患者靶控输注的效应室靶控模型建立与性能评估
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):865-872. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002814.
3
Refining Target-Controlled Infusion: An Assessment of Pharmacodynamic Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Remifentanil Using a Response Surface Model of Their Combined Effects on Bispectral Index.优化靶控输注:基于丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼联合效应的反应曲面模型评估脑电双频指数指导下的靶控输注。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):90-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000386.
4
Prospective clinical validation of the Eleveld propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in general anaesthesia.依托咪酯药效动力学模型在全身麻醉中进行前瞻性临床验证。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.027. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Predictive pharmacodynamic performance of the Eleveld pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol: comparison of predicted and measured bispectral index.依托咪酯药效动力学模型的药效预测性能:预测与实测双频谱指数的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;133(4):785-792. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.041. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
6
Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and dosing simulation of propofol maintenance anesthesia in severely obese adolescents.严重肥胖青少年丙泊酚维持麻醉的群体药代动力学-药效学建模与给药模拟
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Sep;25(9):911-923. doi: 10.1111/pan.12684. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
The performance of compartmental and physiologically based recirculatory pharmacokinetic models for propofol: a comparison using bolus, continuous, and target-controlled infusion data.隔室和基于生理的丙泊酚再循环药代动力学模型的性能:使用推注、连续和靶控输注数据的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):368-79. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bdcf5b. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
8
Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of propofol in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: a study using Bispectral index and composite auditory evoked potentials as pharmacodynamic endpoints.青少年脊柱侧弯手术中术中唤醒试验时依托咪酯的群体药代动力学-药效学模型:以双频谱指数和复合听觉诱发电位为药效终点的研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 22;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0684-z.
9
Predictive performance of 'Servin's formula' during BIS-guided propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion in morbidly obese patients.“塞尔文公式”在病态肥胖患者双频谱指数(BIS)引导下丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注中的预测性能。
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):66-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael321. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
10
Influence of Remifentanil on the Control Performance of the Bispectral Index Controlled Bayesian-Based Closed-Loop System for Propofol Administration.瑞芬太尼对依托咪酯给药的双频谱指数控制贝叶斯闭环系统控制性能的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1661-1669. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004208.

引用本文的文献

1
Total intravenous-opioid-free anesthesia/analgesia (OFAA) for a morbid obese patient with a body mass index of 99 kg/m undergoing gastric bypass: a case report.为一名体重指数为99kg/m²的病态肥胖患者进行胃旁路手术时采用全静脉无阿片类麻醉/镇痛(OFAA):一例病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2025 Aug 15;19(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s13256-025-05484-9.
2
Propofol: A Medication That Changed Pediatric Anesthesia Practice.丙泊酚:一种改变小儿麻醉实践的药物。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Sep;35(9):695-706. doi: 10.1111/pan.70001. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
3
A systematic review of dexmedetomidine pharmacology in pediatric patients.
小儿患者右美托咪定药理学的系统评价
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec;17(12):e70020. doi: 10.1111/cts.70020.
4
The concept of "fictitious weight" in pharmacokinetic simulations and target-controlled infusion.药代动力学模拟与靶控输注中的“虚拟体重”概念。
J Anesth. 2024 Dec;38(6):733-737. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03413-6. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
5
Feasibility of calculating rocuronium dosage by skeletal muscle weight in patients with obesity.肥胖患者中根据骨骼肌重量计算罗库溴铵剂量的可行性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 30;11:1399475. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1399475. eCollection 2024.
6
Considerations for Satisfactory Sedation during Dental Implant Surgery.牙种植手术中实现满意镇静的考量因素。
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):461. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030461.
7
Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery.人工智能在减重手术中的应用现状。
Obes Surg. 2022 Aug;32(8):2717-2733. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06100-1. Epub 2022 May 26.
8
Online exhaled propofol monitoring in normal-weight and obese surgical patients.在线监测正常体重和肥胖手术患者呼出的丙泊酚。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 May;66(5):598-605. doi: 10.1111/aas.14043. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update.减重手术围手术期护理指南:术后加速康复(ERAS)学会推荐意见:2021年更新版
World J Surg. 2022 Apr;46(4):729-751. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Obesity and anesthetic pharmacology: simulation of target-controlled infusion models of propofol and remifentanil.肥胖与麻醉药理学:丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注模型的模拟。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):478-487. doi: 10.4097/kja.21345. Epub 2021 Aug 18.