• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于巴氏涂片结果的子宫颈锥切术:“所见即治疗”方法

Uterine cervix conization based on Pap smear results: the "see and treat" approach.

作者信息

Meirovitz Mihai, Gatt Dvir, Dreiher Jacob, Shaco-Levy Ruthy

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2014 May;16(5):303-6.

PMID:24979836
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "see and treat" approach, proceeding without a biopsy directly to uterine cervix conization in women diagnosed with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) on Pap smear, shortens the treatment duration, lessens patient anxiety, and reduces health care costs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the level of diagnostic accuracy and the over-treatment rate in the "see and treat" versus conventional management of women diagnosed with HGSIL.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all women with HGSIL who had undergone the "see and treat" approach during 2001-2011 at Soroka University Medical Center. Similar cohorts, who were managed conventionally with a cervical biopsy prior to the conization, served as a comparison group.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 403 women: 72 (18%) had undergone the "see and treat" approach and 331 (82%) conventional management. The false positive rate was 11% for the "see and treat" group, compared to 6% for the conventional management group (P = 0.162). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed when comparing the positive predictive value (PPV) of high grade dysplasia diagnosed on Pap smear (PPV 88.9%) versus cervical biopsy (PPV 93.8%) (P = 0.204). Moreover, both the false positive rate and PPV remained similar in subgroups of patients, according to age, menopausal status, number of births, and colposcopy findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy level of HGSIL diagnosis on Pap smear is similar to that of high grade dysplasia on a cervical biopsy. We therefore recommend referring patients with HGSIL directly to conization. Skipping the biopsy step was not associated with significant over-treatment or other adverse effects.

摘要

背景

“即诊即治”方法是指在巴氏涂片检查诊断为高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HGSIL)的女性中,不进行活检直接进行子宫颈锥切术,该方法缩短了治疗时间,减轻了患者焦虑,并降低了医疗成本。

目的

评估“即诊即治”与传统管理方式在诊断为HGSIL的女性中的诊断准确性水平和过度治疗率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2001年至2011年期间在索罗卡大学医学中心接受“即诊即治”方法的所有HGSIL女性患者。将在锥切术前常规进行宫颈活检的类似队列作为对照组。

结果

研究人群包括403名女性:72名(18%)接受了“即诊即治”方法,331名(82%)接受了传统管理。“即诊即治”组的假阳性率为11%,而传统管理组为6%(P = 0.162)。同样,比较巴氏涂片诊断的高级别发育异常的阳性预测值(PPV 88.9%)与宫颈活检的阳性预测值(PPV 93.8%)时,未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.204)。此外,根据年龄、绝经状态、分娩次数和阴道镜检查结果,患者亚组中的假阳性率和PPV保持相似。

结论

巴氏涂片上HGSIL诊断的准确性水平与宫颈活检中高级别发育异常的准确性水平相似。因此,我们建议将HGSIL患者直接转诊至锥切术。跳过活检步骤与显著的过度治疗或其他不良反应无关。

相似文献

1
Uterine cervix conization based on Pap smear results: the "see and treat" approach.基于巴氏涂片结果的子宫颈锥切术:“所见即治疗”方法
Isr Med Assoc J. 2014 May;16(5):303-6.
2
Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.宫颈转化区的电外科环形切除术:家庭医生的经验
J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337-44.
3
Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.液基薄层涂片检查的准确性:对782名既往巴氏涂片异常的女性进行同步液基检查与宫颈活检的比较
Acta Cytol. 2005 Mar-Apr;49(2):132-8. doi: 10.1159/000326120.
4
A retrospective observational study for the outcomes of women presenting to a colposcopy clinic with a high-grade Pap smear - Implications for a 'see and treat' approach to management.一项针对因高级别巴氏涂片检查结果而前往阴道镜诊所就诊的女性的结局的回顾性观察研究——对“检查并治疗”管理方法的启示。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;56(2):207-11. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12450. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.在基于转诊的巴氏涂片异常人群中,Digene杂交捕获HPV DNA检测的临床价值。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19(3):203-8.
6
Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.阴道镜检查、穿刺活检与锥形切除标本最终组织学检查结果的差异:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1271-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4714-8. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
The prevalence and course of preinvasive cervical lesions during pregnancy in a Northern Nigerian Teaching Hospital.尼日利亚北部一家教学医院孕期宫颈浸润前病变的患病率及病程
Ann Afr Med. 2017 Apr-Jun;16(2):74-80. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_35_16.
8
'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.“见即治疗”宫颈转化区电外科环切术
J Fam Pract. 1996 Mar;42(3):253-7.
9
A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?对高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)巴氏涂片结果女性进行“即见即治”的前瞻性评估:这是一种合适的策略吗?
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Jan;9(1):2-6. doi: 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00002.
10
Improved early detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions by combination of conventional Pap smear and speculoscopy.通过传统巴氏涂片和阴道镜检查相结合提高宫颈上皮内病变的早期检测率。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(6):495-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The overtreatment rate, medical cost and psychological affection of see-and-treat versus three-step approaches in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗中“即诊即治”与三步法的过度治疗率、医疗成本及心理影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03718-y.
2
Overtreatment and Cost-Effectiveness of the See-and-Treat Strategy for Managing Cervical Precancer.宫颈癌前病变管理中“即诊即治”策略的过度治疗与成本效益
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 May;25(5):807-14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1044. Epub 2016 Feb 29.