Benson Mark, Grimes Ian, Gopal Deepak, Reichelderfer Mark, Soni Anurag, Benson Holly, Austin Kerstin, Pfau Patrick
Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;109(8):1133-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.28. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
There are few studies evaluating the influence of sleep deprivation on endoscopic outcomes. To evaluate the effect of a previous night call on the quality of screening colonoscopies performed the following day.
Average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopies were included. Quality metrics were retrospectively compared between two groups of post-call colonoscopies and colonoscopies performed by the same individuals not on call the night before: those performed by gastroenterologists who were only on call the night prior and those performed by gastroenterologists who performed emergent on-call procedures the night prior.
Between 1 July 2010 and 31 March 2012, 447 colonoscopies were performed by gastroenterologists who were on call only the night prior, 126 colonoscopies were performed by gastroenterologists who had completed on-call emergent procedures the night prior, and 8,734 control colonoscopies were completed. There was a lower percent of patients who were screened with adenomas detected in procedures performed by endoscopists who had performed emergent on-call procedures the night prior compared with the controls (30 vs. 39%, respectively; P=0.043). The mean withdrawal time for these colonoscopies was significantly longer than that for the control procedures (15.5 vs. 14.0 min; P=0.025). For the colonoscopies performed by endoscopists who were on call only the night prior, there was no significant difference in the percent of patients screened with adenomas detected compared with controls (42 vs. 39%, respectively; P=0.136).
(1) Despite longer withdrawal times, being on call the night prior and performing an emergent procedure lead to a significant 24% decrease in the adenoma detection rates. (2) It is imperative for screening physicians to be aware of the influence of sleep deprivation on procedural outcomes and to consider altering their practice accordingly.
评估睡眠剥夺对内镜检查结果影响的研究较少。本研究旨在评估前一晚值班对次日进行的结肠镜筛查质量的影响。
纳入接受结肠镜筛查的平均风险患者。回顾性比较两组次日进行的结肠镜检查的质量指标:一组是前一晚仅值班的胃肠病学家所做的结肠镜检查,另一组是前一晚进行了急诊值班手术的胃肠病学家所做的结肠镜检查,同时与同一批未在前一晚值班的医生所做的结肠镜检查进行比较。
2010年7月1日至2012年3月31日期间,前一晚仅值班的胃肠病学家进行了447例结肠镜检查,前一晚完成急诊值班手术的胃肠病学家进行了126例结肠镜检查,完成对照结肠镜检查8734例。与对照组相比,前一晚进行了急诊值班手术的内镜医师所做检查中检测到腺瘤的筛查患者百分比更低(分别为30%和39%;P = 0.043)。这些结肠镜检查的平均退镜时间显著长于对照检查(15.5分钟对14.0分钟;P = 0.025)。对于前一晚仅值班的内镜医师所做的结肠镜检查,检测到腺瘤的筛查患者百分比与对照组相比无显著差异(分别为42%和39%;P = 0.136)。
(1)尽管退镜时间更长,但前一晚值班并进行急诊手术会导致腺瘤检出率显著降低24%。(2)筛查医生必须意识到睡眠剥夺对检查结果的影响,并相应地考虑调整他们的做法。