Suppr超能文献

马拉维若与依非韦伦治疗初治HIV-1患者的疗效和安全性:5年研究结果

Efficacy and safety of maraviroc vs. efavirenz in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1: 5-year findings.

作者信息

Cooper David A, Heera Jayvant, Ive Prudence, Botes Mariette, Dejesus Edwin, Burnside Robert, Clumeck Nathan, Walmsley Sharon, Lazzarin Adriano, Mukwaya Geoffrey, Saag Michael, van Der Ryst Elna

机构信息

aKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia bPfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA cUniversity of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg dPrivate Practice, Pretoria, South Africa eOrlando Immunology Center, Orlando, Florida, USA fSaint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium gUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada hSan Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy iPfizer Inc, New York jUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA kPfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, UK.

出版信息

AIDS. 2014 Mar 13;28(5):717-25. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000131.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Maraviroc, a chemokine co-receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist, has demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to efavirenz, each in combination with zidovudine/lamivudine, over 96 weeks in the Maraviroc vs. Efavirenz Regimens as Initial Therapy (MERIT) study. Here we report 5-year findings.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase IIb/III study with an open-label extension phase.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection (Trofile) received maraviroc 300 mg twice daily or efavirenz 600 mg once daily, and zidovudine/lamivudine 300 mg/150 mg twice daily. After the last patient's week 96 visit, the study was unblinded and patients could enter a nominal 3-year open-label phase. Endpoints at the 5-year nominal visit (week 240) included proportion of patients (CCR5 tropism re-confirmed by enhanced sensitivity Trofile) with viral load (plasma HIV-1 RNA) below 50 and 400 copies/ml, and change from baseline in CD4(+) cell count, as well as safety.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients maintaining viral load below 50 copies/ml was similar between treatment arms throughout the study and at week 240 (maraviroc 50.8% vs. efavirenz 45.9%). Maraviroc-treated patients had a greater increase from baseline in mean CD4(+) cell count than efavirenz-treated patients at week 240 (293 vs. 271 cells/μl, respectively). Fewer patients on maraviroc vs. efavirenz experienced treatment-related adverse events (68.9 vs. 81.7%) and discontinued as a result of any adverse event (10.6 vs. 21.3%).

CONCLUSION

Maraviroc maintained similar long-term antiviral efficacy to efavirenz over 5 years in treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1. Maraviroc was generally well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings or evidence of long-term safety concerns.

摘要

目的

在“马拉维若与依非韦伦方案作为初始治疗的疗效比较(MERIT)”研究中,为期96周的试验表明,趋化因子共受体5型(CCR5)拮抗剂马拉维若与依非韦伦分别联合齐多夫定/拉米夫定治疗时,疗效和安全性相当。在此,我们报告该研究的5年随访结果。

设计

一项随机、双盲、多中心IIb/III期研究,并设有开放标签延长期。

方法

初治的CCR5嗜性HIV-1感染患者(Trofile检测)接受每日两次300 mg马拉维若或每日一次600 mg依非韦伦,以及每日两次300 mg/150 mg齐多夫定/拉米夫定治疗。在最后一名患者完成第96周访视后,研究揭盲,患者可进入为期3年的开放标签阶段。在第5年(第240周)的访视中,研究终点包括病毒载量(血浆HIV-1 RNA)低于50拷贝/ml和400拷贝/ml的患者比例(通过增强敏感性Trofile重新确认CCR5嗜性)、CD4(+)细胞计数相对于基线的变化,以及安全性。

结果

在整个研究期间以及第240周时,各治疗组中病毒载量维持在50拷贝/ml以下的患者比例相似(马拉维若组为50.8%,依非韦伦组为45.9%)。在第240周时,接受马拉维若治疗的患者平均CD4(+)细胞计数相对于基线的增加幅度大于接受依非韦伦治疗的患者(分别为293个/μl和271个/μl)。与接受依非韦伦治疗的患者相比,接受马拉维若治疗的患者发生治疗相关不良事件的人数较少(分别为68.9%和81.7%),因任何不良事件而停药的患者也较少(分别为10.6%和21.3%)。

结论

在初治的CCR5嗜性HIV-1感染患者中,马拉维若在5年期间维持了与依非韦伦相似的长期抗病毒疗效。马拉维若总体耐受性良好,未发现意外的安全性问题,也没有长期安全性担忧的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a26/3940293/5118b0d3b16c/aids-28-717-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验