Suppr超能文献

预防性扁桃体周围地塞米松与左旋布比卡因浸润用于缓解儿童腺样体扁桃体切除术后疼痛的对照临床研究

Pre-emptive peritonsillar dexamethasone vs. levobupivacaine infiltration for relief of post-adenotonsillectomy pain in children: a controlled clinical study.

作者信息

Aysenur Dostbil, Mine Celik, Ozgur Yoruk, Ahmet Alıcı Hacı, Fuat Erdem Ali, Ilker Ince, Ali Ahiskalıoglu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, 25100 Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep;78(9):1467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of the pre-emptive local infiltration of dexamethasone vs. levobupivacaine on postoperative pain and morbidity in pediatric adenotonsillectomy patients.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients (32 males and 28 females), aged 3-14 years, were included in this double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical study from September of 2011 until May of 2012. Patients admitted for adenotonsillectomies after informed consent was obtained from the parents, and randomized into three groups receiving either dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Group 1, mean age 5.9 ± 1.6), levobupivacaine with epinephrine (Group 2, mean age 6.1 ± 2.6), or saline (Group 3, mean age 6.0 ± 3.4). Pain scores at the 1st, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, and 20th hours, and first, second, third and seventh days post-operatively were recorded by the parents using McGrath's face scale. The operation type, operation time and anesthesia time, the time of the first request for postoperative analgesia, and the total number of analgesic interventions were recorded.

RESULTS

Pain scores were revealed in this order: Group 1 (steroid) < Group 2 (levobupivacaine) < Group 3 (saline) at all times (p = 0.000). The anesthesia times for Group 1 and Group 2 were different (steroid vs. levobupivacaine), and the time to first analgesic was longer in Groups 1 (steroid) and 2 (levobupivacaine) than in Group 3 (saline) (p < 0.000). The total number of analgesic interventions was lower in Group 1 (steroid) than in Group 2 (levobupivacaine) and Group 3 (saline) (steroid vs. saline, p = 0.000, and steroid vs. levobupivacaine, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Peritonsillar dexamethasone infiltration was more effective than both levobupivacaine and saline in reducing post-tonsillectomy pain. It was proven to be a safe and effective method.

摘要

目的

探讨地塞米松与左旋布比卡因预先局部浸润对小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术后疼痛及并发症的影响。

方法

2011年9月至2012年5月,本双盲前瞻性随机对照临床研究共纳入60例年龄3至14岁的患者(男32例,女28例)。经家长知情同意后接受腺样体扁桃体切除术的患者,随机分为三组,分别接受磷酸地塞米松(第1组,平均年龄5.9±1.6岁)、含肾上腺素的左旋布比卡因(第2组,平均年龄6.1±2.6岁)或生理盐水(第3组,平均年龄6.0±3.4岁)。术后第1、4、8、12、16和20小时以及术后第1、2、3和7天的疼痛评分由家长使用麦格拉思面部表情量表记录。记录手术类型、手术时间和麻醉时间、首次术后镇痛请求时间以及镇痛干预的总数。

结果

所有时间点的疼痛评分依次为:第1组(类固醇)<第2组(左旋布比卡因)<第3组(生理盐水)(p = 0.000)。第1组和第2组的麻醉时间不同(类固醇与左旋布比卡因),第1组(类固醇)和第2组(左旋布比卡因)首次镇痛的时间比第3组(生理盐水)长(p < 0.000)。第1组(类固醇)的镇痛干预总数低于第2组(左旋布比卡因)和第3组(生理盐水)(类固醇与生理盐水,p = 0.000,类固醇与左旋布比卡因,p < 0.05)。

结论

扁桃体周围地塞米松浸润在减轻扁桃体切除术后疼痛方面比左旋布比卡因和生理盐水更有效。事实证明这是一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验