• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠状动脉搭桥患者自体血管的异常干预]

[Unusual intervention of native vessel in patient with coronary artery bypass].

作者信息

Coufal Zdeněk, Gřiva Martin, Náplava Robert

出版信息

Vnitr Lek. 2014 Apr;60(4):289-92.

PMID:24985986
Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is older method of revascluarization treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) then percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but in some cases, especially in multivessel disease or chronic total occlusions, still used. Extending survival of patients with CAD increases number of recathetrizations and interventions namely in post-CABG subjects. Due to degenerative and atherosclerotic changes of bypasses, especially venous grafts, interventional cardiologists are forced to solve often complicated findings. In other cases patients are reoperated with increased risk. Our task describes unusual, technically challenging and somewhat risk PCI of native vessel through arterial bypass in post-PCI patient with significant angina.

摘要

冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种比经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)更早用于治疗冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的血管重建方法,但在某些情况下,尤其是在多支血管病变或慢性完全闭塞时,仍在使用。提高CAD患者的生存率增加了再次导管插入术和干预的次数,特别是在CABG术后患者中。由于旁路血管,尤其是静脉移植物的退行性和动脉粥样硬化改变,介入心脏病学家常常被迫解决复杂的病变。在其他情况下,患者再次手术的风险会增加。我们的任务描述了在一位有严重心绞痛的PCI术后患者中,通过动脉旁路对自身血管进行的不寻常、技术上具有挑战性且有一定风险的PCI。

相似文献

1
[Unusual intervention of native vessel in patient with coronary artery bypass].[冠状动脉搭桥患者自体血管的异常干预]
Vnitr Lek. 2014 Apr;60(4):289-92.
2
Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery.孤立性左前降支近端病变:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术疗效比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001.
3
Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.在多支冠状动脉疾病中,与药物洗脱支架经皮介入治疗相比,多动脉血管移植术具有生存优势:一项倾向评分调整分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;189:153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.059. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
4
Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.再次血运重建的差异是否解释了搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比的抗心绞痛益处?对未来治疗比较的启示。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964585. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
5
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
6
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:六项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Coronary Arteries Versus Bypass Grafts in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的应用:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):884-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.034. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I200-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681148.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.