• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版与人格障碍:第二轴去了哪里?

DSM-5 and personality disorders: where did axis II go?

作者信息

Trestman Robert L

机构信息

Dr. Trestman is Professor of Medicine, Psychiatry and Nursing, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(2):141-5.

PMID:24986340
Abstract

The past decade has seen a period of extensive research into the etiology, pathophysiology, assessment, and treatment of personality disorders. Concomitantly, a group of experts in the field were brought together to form the Personality and Personality Disorder Work Group for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), charged with the responsibility of updating the diagnostic approach to personality disorders. This article is a review of some of the history of the American Psychiatry Association's approach to the recognition and diagnosis of personality disorders over the past half century, the process of developing the recommendations for a DSM-5 personality disorder diagnosis and the elimination of the multiaxial system, and how DSM-5 has left us with essentially no changes of relevance to the practice of forensic psychiatry in the process for diagnosing personality disorders or in the specific diagnoses of personality disorder.

摘要

在过去十年里,人们对人格障碍的病因、病理生理学、评估和治疗进行了广泛研究。与此同时,该领域的一群专家齐聚一堂,组成了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的人格与人格障碍工作组,负责更新人格障碍的诊断方法。本文回顾了美国精神病学协会在过去半个世纪中对人格障碍的识别和诊断方法的一些历史,制定DSM-5人格障碍诊断建议和取消多轴系统的过程,以及DSM-5在人格障碍诊断过程中或人格障碍的具体诊断方面,如何让我们在法医精神病学实践中基本上没有看到相关性的变化。

相似文献

1
DSM-5 and personality disorders: where did axis II go?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版与人格障碍:第二轴去了哪里?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(2):141-5.
2
Retention or deletion of personality disorder diagnoses for DSM-5: an expert consensus approach.保留或删除 DSM-5 人格障碍诊断:专家共识方法。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Oct;26(5):689-703. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.689.
3
Narcissistic pathology as core personality dysfunction: comparing the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 proposal for narcissistic personality disorder.自恋型人格障碍的核心人格障碍:比较 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 自恋型人格障碍提案。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;68(8):908-21. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21895. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
After DSM-5: where does personality disorder research go from here?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版之后:人格障碍研究将何去何从?
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):216-21. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000041.
5
The plight of personality disorders in the DSM-5.《DSM-5 中的人格障碍困境》
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Sep;33(9):598-604. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.704133.
6
Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: a proposal for DSM-V.整合正常和异常人格结构:DSM-V 的建议。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Jun;25(3):338-63. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.338.
7
Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍评估
J Pers Assess. 2015 Sep-Oct;97(5):456-66. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1041142. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Validating the proposed diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, severity indicator for personality disorder.验证《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第5版)》中提议的人格障碍严重程度指标。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Sep;201(9):729-35. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a20ea8.
9
A postmortem and future look at the personality disorders in DSM-5.DSM-5 中人格障碍的回顾与展望
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):382-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000030.
10
Personality disorders in DSM-5.DSM-5 中的人格障碍。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:317-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131.

引用本文的文献

1
Forensic psychiatry, one subspecialty with two ethics? A systematic review.法医精神病学,一个具有两种伦理规范的亚专业?一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 10;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0266-5.
2
Seeking to understand lived experiences of personal recovery in personality disorder in community and forensic settings - a qualitative methods investigation.探索社区和法医环境中人格障碍患者个人康复的生活经历——一项定性方法调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1442-8.