Wheeler T A, Siders K T, Anderson M G, Russell S A, Woodward J E, Mullinix B G
Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 79403.
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Levelland, TX 79336.
J Nematol. 2014 Jun;46(2):101-7.
Management of Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) in cotton in the United States was substantially affected by the decision to stop production of aldicarb by its principle manufacturer in 2011. The remaining commercially available tools to manage M. incognita included soil fumigation, nematicide seed treatments, postemergence nematicide application, and cultivars partially resistant to M. incognita. Small plot field studies were conducted on a total of nine sites from 2011-2013 to examine the effects of each of these tools alone or in combinations, on early season galling, late-season nematode density in soil, yield, and value ($/ha = lint value minus chemical costs/ha). The use of a partially resistant cultivar resulted in fewer galls/root system at 35 d after planting in eight of nine tests, lower root-knot nematode density late in the growing season for all test sites, higher lint yield in eight of nine sites, and higher value/ha in six of nine sites. Galls per root were reduced by aldicarb in three of nine sites and by 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) in two of eight sites, relative to the nontreated control (no insecticide or nematicide treatment). Soil fumigation reduced M. incognita density late in the season in three of nine sites. Value/ha was not affected by chemical treatment in four of nine sites, but there was a cultivar × chemical interaction in four of nine sites. When value/ha was affected by chemical treatment, the nontreated control had a similar value to the treatment with the highest value/ha in seven of eight cultivar-site combinations. The next "best" value/ha were associated with seed treatment insecticide (STI) + oxamyl and aldicarb (similar value to the highest value/ha in six of eight cultivar-site combinations). The lowest valued treatment was STI + 1,3-D. In a semi-arid region, where rainfall was low during the spring for all three years, cultivars with partial resistance to M. incognita was the most profitable method of managing root-knot nematode in cotton.
2011年,涕灭威的主要生产商停止生产该产品,这对美国棉花根结线虫的防治产生了重大影响。当时,用于防治根结线虫的其他商业可用手段包括土壤熏蒸、杀线虫剂种子处理、苗后施用杀线虫剂以及对根结线虫具有部分抗性的品种。2011年至2013年期间,在总共九个地点进行了小区田间试验,以研究这些手段单独使用或组合使用对棉花早期虫瘿形成、生长季后期土壤中线虫密度、产量以及价值(美元/公顷 = 皮棉价值减去每公顷化学成本)的影响。在九个试验中的八个试验里,种植35天后,使用部分抗性品种使得每个根系上的虫瘿数量减少;在所有试验地点,生长季后期根结线虫密度降低;在九个试验地点中的八个,皮棉产量提高;在九个试验地点中的六个,每公顷价值增加。与未处理对照(不使用杀虫剂或杀线虫剂处理)相比,在九个试验地点中的三个,涕灭威减少了每个根上的虫瘿数量;在八个试验地点中的两个,1,3 - 二氯丙烯(1,3 - D)减少了虫瘿数量。在九个试验地点中的三个,土壤熏蒸降低了生长季后期根结线虫的密度。在九个试验地点中的四个,化学处理对每公顷价值没有影响,但在九个试验地点中的四个存在品种×化学处理的相互作用。当每公顷价值受化学处理影响时,在八个品种 - 试验地点组合中的七个,未处理对照与每公顷价值最高的处理具有相似的价值。接下来“最佳”的每公顷价值与种子处理杀虫剂(STI)+ 草氨酰和涕灭威相关(在八个品种 - 试验地点组合中的六个,其价值与最高价值相似)。价值最低的处理是STI + 1,3 - D。在一个半干旱地区,这三年春季降雨量都很低,种植对根结线虫具有部分抗性的品种是防治棉花根结线虫最有利可图的方法。