• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院间转运对学术医疗中心手术质量指标的影响。

The impact of interhospital transfers on surgical quality metrics for academic medical centers.

作者信息

Crippen Cristina J, Hughes Steven J, Chen Sugong, Behrns Kevin E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Jul;80(7):690-5.

PMID:24987902
Abstract

The emergence of pay-for-performance systems pose a risk to an academic medical center's (AMC) mission to provide care for interhospital surgical transfer patients. This study examines quality metrics and resource consumption for a sample of these patients from the University Health System Consortium (UHC) and our Department of Surgery (DOS). Standard benchmarks, including mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), and cost, were used to evaluate the impact of interhospital surgical transfers versus direct admission (DA) patients from January 2010 to December 2012. For 1,423,893 patients, the case mix index for transfer patients was 38 per cent (UHC) and 21 per cent (DOS) greater than DA patients. Mortality rates were 5.70 per cent (UHC) and 6.93 per cent (DOS) in transferred patients compared with 1.79 per cent (UHC) and 2.93 per cent (DOS) for DA patients. Mean LOS for DA patients was 4 days shorter. Mean total costs for transferred patients were greater $13,613 (UHC) and $13,356 (DOS). Transfer patients have poorer outcomes and consume more resources than DA patients. Early recognition and transfer of complex surgical patients may improve patient rescue and decrease resource consumption. Surgeons at AMCs and in the community should develop collaborative programs that permit collective assessment and decision-making for complicated surgical patients.

摘要

绩效薪酬制度的出现给学术医疗中心(AMC)为院际手术转诊患者提供护理的使命带来了风险。本研究调查了大学卫生系统联盟(UHC)和我们外科系(DOS)的这些患者样本的质量指标和资源消耗情况。采用包括死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和成本在内的标准基准,来评估2010年1月至2012年12月期间院际手术转诊患者与直接入院(DA)患者的影响。对于1423893名患者,转诊患者的病例组合指数比DA患者高38%(UHC)和21%(DOS)。转诊患者的死亡率分别为5.70%(UHC)和6.93%(DOS),而DA患者的死亡率分别为1.79%(UHC)和2.93%(DOS)。DA患者的平均住院时间短4天。转诊患者的平均总费用分别比DA患者多13613美元(UHC)和13356美元(DOS)。与DA患者相比,转诊患者的预后较差且消耗更多资源。早期识别和转诊复杂手术患者可能会改善患者救治并减少资源消耗。AMC和社区的外科医生应制定合作项目,以便对复杂手术患者进行集体评估和决策。

相似文献

1
The impact of interhospital transfers on surgical quality metrics for academic medical centers.医院间转运对学术医疗中心手术质量指标的影响。
Am Surg. 2014 Jul;80(7):690-5.
2
Impact of interhospital transfers on outcomes in an academic medical center. Implications for profiling hospital quality.学术医疗中心内院间转运对治疗结果的影响。对医院质量评估的启示。
Med Care. 1996 Apr;34(4):295-309. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199604000-00002.
3
Outcomes in head and neck oncologic surgery at academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术医疗中心头颈部肿瘤外科的治疗结果。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Mar;123(3):689-98. doi: 10.1002/lary.23835.
4
Interhospital transfer and adverse outcomes after general surgery: implications for pay for performance.外科手术后的院内转院与不良结局:对按绩效付费的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Mar;218(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
5
Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.手术质量改进中风险调整方法的比较
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.010.
6
Prognostic factors for mortality following interhospital transfers to the medical intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center.三级转诊中心内科重症监护病房院间转运后死亡的预后因素。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;31(7):1981-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069730.02769.16.
7
Palliative care benchmarks from academic medical centers.来自学术医疗中心的姑息治疗基准。
J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):86-98. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0048.
8
Do faculty intensivists have better outcomes when caring for patients directly in a closed ICU versus consulting in an open ICU?在封闭式重症监护病房(ICU)直接护理患者时,与在开放式ICU进行会诊相比,专科重症监护医生的治疗效果会更好吗?
Hosp Pract (1995). 2009 Dec;37(1):40-50. doi: 10.3810/hp.2009.12.253.
9
Accepting critically ill transfer patients: adverse effect on a referral center's outcome and benchmark measures.接收重症转诊患者:对转诊中心的结局及基准指标的不良影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):882-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00009.
10
Interhospital transfer of critically ill and injured children: an evaluation of transfer patterns, resource utilization, and clinical outcomes.危重症和受伤儿童的院际转运:转运模式、资源利用及临床结局评估
J Hosp Med. 2009 Mar;4(3):164-70. doi: 10.1002/jhm.418.

引用本文的文献

1
Perforated peptic ulcer disease in transferred patients is associated with significant increase in length of stay.转移患者的穿孔性消化性溃疡疾病与住院时间的显著延长有关。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1576-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10600-1. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
Esophagram should be performed to diagnose esophageal perforation before inter-hospital transfer.在院际转运前应进行食管造影以诊断食管穿孔。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Jun 30;15(6):2984-2996. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1798. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Impact of interhospital transfer on emergency department timeliness of care and in-hospital outcomes of adult non-trauma patients.
医院间转运对成年非创伤患者急诊科护理及时性及住院结局的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):e13393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13393. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
SafeNET: Initial development and validation of a real-time tool for predicting mortality risk at the time of hospital transfer to a higher level of care.SafeNET:一种实时工具的初步开发和验证,用于预测在转往更高层级护理时的死亡风险。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246669. eCollection 2021.
5
Effect of Transfer Status on Outcomes of Emergency General Surgery Patients.急诊普通外科患者的转归状态对结局的影响。
Surgery. 2020 Aug;168(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
Sepsis as the primary admitting diagnosis of transferred patients who died within 48 hours of arrival at a Central Texas hospital.脓毒症作为转院患者的主要入院诊断,这些患者在抵达德克萨斯州中部一家医院后的48小时内死亡。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Jul 30;32(4):481-484. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1642062. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Impact of transfer status on real-world outcomes in nonelective cardiac surgery.非选择性心脏手术中转患者身份对真实世界结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):540-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.107. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Acuity, outcomes, and trends in the transfer of surgical patients: a national study.外科患者转运的敏锐度、结果及趋势:一项全国性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4361-0. Epub 2015 Jul 3.