Suppr超能文献

社区医院中医生的“不要复苏”决策与文件记录

Physicians' do-not-resuscitate decisions and documentation in a community hospital.

作者信息

Lipton H L

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacy, San Francisco 94143.

出版信息

QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989 Apr;15(4):108-13. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30275-5.

Abstract

Physician documentation of the participants in do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions and the equitability of DNR decisions were studied in a 450-bed community hospital in San Francisco. All 333 patients who received written DNR orders and the 108 physicians who made DNR decisions were studied. Of the sampled records, 45% contained no documentation of who participated in the DNR decision. Only 38% of the documented records showed that patients were involved in the DNR decision. In the remaining cases (62%), families were involved as surrogate decision makers. The rate of physicians' DNR decision-making varied according to physician specialty: Oncologists, neurologists, gastroenterologists, and pulmonologists had the highest rates, while surgeons, cardiologists, and general practitioners had the lowest.

摘要

在旧金山一家拥有450张床位的社区医院,对医生记录的不进行心肺复苏(DNR)决策参与者以及DNR决策的公平性进行了研究。研究了所有333名接受书面DNR医嘱的患者以及做出DNR决策的108名医生。在抽样记录中,45%没有记录谁参与了DNR决策。只有38%的有记录的病例显示患者参与了DNR决策。在其余病例(62%)中,家属作为替代决策者参与其中。医生做出DNR决策的比例因医生专业而异:肿瘤学家、神经科医生、胃肠科医生和肺科医生的比例最高,而外科医生、心脏病专家和全科医生的比例最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验