• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

POSSUM评分在预测急诊剖腹手术患者预后中的效能。

Efficacy of POSSUM score in predicting the outcome in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

作者信息

Sreeharsha Harinatha, Sp Rai, Sreekar Harinatha, Reddy Ravi

出版信息

Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Apr;86(4):159-65. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029.

DOI:10.2478/pjs-2014-0029
PMID:24988229
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity.

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a group known to be at high risk of complications and death.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 100 cases of emergency laparotomies were studied in patients admitted in general surgery department during the period of May 2008 to August 2010. The study group consisted of the following cases. Duodenal perforation (37 cases), intestinal obstruction (27 cases), gastric perforation (8 cases), ileal perforation (8 cases), appendicular perforation (7 cases), blunt trauma (4 cases) and others (9 cases). They were scored using POSSUM scoring system. Physiological scoring was done at the time of admission and operative scoring was done intraoperatively. They were followed up for the first 30 day post operative period for any complications and the outcome was noted. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with the POSSUM predicted morbidity and mortality rates.

RESULTS

15 patients died (mortality rate of 15%). The POSSUM predicted mortality was 20 deaths. O:E ratio of 0.71 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates (χ²=1.72, p=0.974). 71 patients experienced complications. The POSSUM predicted morbidity was 61 patients. O:E ratio of 1.19 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted morbidity rates (χ²=1.594, p=0.991).

CONCLUSIONS

POSSUM scoring is an accurate predictor of mortality and morbidity following emergency laparotomy and is a valid means of assessing adequacy of care provided to the patient. POSSUM can be used for surgical audit to assess and improve the quality of surgical care and helps in better outcome to the patient.

摘要

未标注

手术结果监测日益成为手术活动管理的重要组成部分。

研究目的

前瞻性应用POSSUM评分系统,以确定其在预测我院接受急诊剖腹手术患者的发病率和死亡率方面的表现,该组患者已知并发症和死亡风险较高。

材料与方法

2008年5月至2010年8月期间,对普外科收治的100例急诊剖腹手术患者进行了研究。研究组包括以下病例。十二指肠穿孔(37例)、肠梗阻(27例)、胃穿孔(8例)、回肠穿孔(8例)、阑尾穿孔(7例)、钝性创伤(4例)及其他(9例)。使用POSSUM评分系统对他们进行评分。入院时进行生理评分,术中进行手术评分。术后对他们进行为期30天的随访,观察有无并发症并记录结果。将观察到的发病率和死亡率与POSSUM预测的发病率和死亡率进行比较。

结果

15例患者死亡(死亡率为15%)。POSSUM预测死亡20例。得到的O:E比值为0.71。观察到的死亡率与预测的死亡率之间无统计学显著差异(χ²=1.72,p=0.974)。71例患者出现并发症。POSSUM预测并发症为61例。得到的O:E比值为1.19。观察到的发病率与预测的发病率之间无统计学显著差异(χ²=1.594,p=0.991)。

结论

POSSUM评分是急诊剖腹手术后死亡率和发病率的准确预测指标,是评估为患者提供的护理是否充分的有效手段。POSSUM可用于手术审计,以评估和改善手术护理质量,并有助于患者获得更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of POSSUM score in predicting the outcome in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.POSSUM评分在预测急诊剖腹手术患者预后中的效能。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Apr;86(4):159-65. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029.
2
Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术患者风险调整审计中POSSUM与P-POSSUM的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Jan;15(1):19-22.
3
POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.用于急诊剖腹手术患者风险调整审计的POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):500-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4465.
4
Pre-operative psoas major measurement compared to P-POSSUM as a prognostic indicator in over-80s undergoing emergency laparotomy.术前腰大肌测量与P-POSSUM相比,作为80岁以上接受急诊剖腹手术患者的预后指标。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1025-5. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
5
Risk-adjusted analysis of patients undergoing laparotomy using POSSUM and P-POSSUM score in Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sabah.在沙巴州伊丽莎白女王医院使用POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分对接受剖腹手术的患者进行风险调整分析。
Med J Malaysia. 2010 Dec;65(4):286-90.
6
[The POSSUM scoring system: an instrument for measuring quality in surgical patients].[POSSUM评分系统:一种用于衡量外科手术患者质量的工具]
Cir Esp. 2006 Dec;80(6):395-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70993-9.
7
Evaluation of POSSUM scoring system in patients with gastric cancer undergoing D2-gastrectomy.对接受D2胃切除术的胃癌患者进行POSSUM评分系统评估。
BMC Surg. 2005 Apr 15;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-5-8.
8
Damage control laparotomy.损伤控制剖腹术
Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):83-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4434.
9
Outcome following emergency surgery for refractory severe ulcerative colitis in a tertiary care centre in India.印度一家三级医疗中心难治性重症溃疡性结肠炎急诊手术后的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 30;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-5-39.
10
Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options.P-POSSUM在梗阻性结直肠癌手术中的评估以及预测死亡率与不同手术方式的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):493-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0766-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.急诊剖腹手术术前风险评估工具的性能:一项系统评价。
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Oct 31;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Emergency Surgery Score as an Effective Risk Stratification Tool for Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgeries: A Narrative Review.急诊手术评分作为急诊手术患者有效风险分层工具的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):e26226. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26226. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.
评估风险:急诊剖腹手术中预后预测的评分系统。
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015 Dec;5(4):20. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0020-y. Epub 2015 Nov 28.