• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

损伤控制剖腹术

Damage control laparotomy.

作者信息

Finlay I G, Edwards T J, Lambert A W

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Ministry of Defence Hospital Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):83-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4434.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.4434
PMID:14716799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is well established in the management of trauma. This study assessed the results of DCS in the management of critically ill patients who had not had trauma.

METHODS

This was a prospective series of patients treated by DCS. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth predictor equation (P-POSSUM) were used to predict the risk of death, which was compared with the observed mortality rate.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were studied. Nine had sepsis from gastrointestinal perforation. Eight of these underwent bowel resection without anastomosis or stoma formation at the initial laparotomy. Six patients later underwent bowel anastomosis and two had an end stoma formed at second laparotomy. A further three patients had a ruptured aortic aneurysm, one had a reactionary haemorrhage after elective aortic surgery, and one had a retroperitoneal bleed; all required haemostatic packing that was removed at second laparotomy. Mortality rates predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring were 64.5 and 49.6 per cent respectively. One patient (7.1 per cent) died after operation, giving an observed mortality rate significantly lower than predicted (P = 0.002 and P = 0.038 versus values predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The use of DCS in the treatment of critically ill patients resulted in a lower mortality rate than that predicted by POSSUM or P-POSSUM. DCS should not be restricted to trauma.

摘要

背景

损伤控制外科手术(DCS)在创伤管理中已得到广泛应用。本研究评估了DCS在非创伤性重症患者管理中的效果。

方法

这是一组接受DCS治疗的前瞻性患者系列。使用用于死亡率和发病率枚举的生理和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM)以及朴茨茅斯预测方程(P-POSSUM)来预测死亡风险,并与观察到的死亡率进行比较。

结果

共研究了14例患者。9例因胃肠道穿孔发生败血症。其中8例在初次剖腹手术时进行了肠切除,未进行吻合或造口形成。6例患者后来进行了肠吻合,2例在第二次剖腹手术时形成了端侧造口。另外3例患者患有主动脉瘤破裂,1例在择期主动脉手术后发生反应性出血,1例发生腹膜后出血;所有患者均需要进行止血填塞,并在第二次剖腹手术时取出。POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分预测的死亡率分别为64.5%和49.6%。1例患者(7.1%)术后死亡,观察到的死亡率显著低于预测值(分别与POSSUM和P-POSSUM预测值相比,P = 0.002和P = 0.038)。

结论

在重症患者治疗中使用DCS导致的死亡率低于POSSUM或P-POSSUM预测的死亡率。DCS不应局限于创伤患者。

相似文献

1
Damage control laparotomy.损伤控制剖腹术
Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):83-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4434.
2
Comparison of POSSUM scoring and the Hardman Index in selection of patients for repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤破裂患者修复选择中POSSUM评分与哈德曼指数的比较。
Br J Surg. 2003 Apr;90(4):421-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4061.
3
The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery.损伤控制的概念:将范式扩展至急诊普通外科。
Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
4
Comparison of POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术患者风险调整审计中POSSUM与P-POSSUM的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Jan;15(1):19-22.
5
Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy.评估POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统在评估腹腔镜结肠切除术后的预后情况。
Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1280-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4224.
6
Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.朴茨茅斯腹主动脉瘤手术的POSSUM模型。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jul;88(7):958-63. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01820.x.
7
Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.在一个发展中国家使用POSSUM评分系统进行风险调整后的外科手术审计。用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理与手术严重程度评分。
Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):110-3. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01979.x.
8
Evaluation of outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection with POSSUM, Portsmouth POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM.使用POSSUM、朴茨茅斯POSSUM和结直肠POSSUM评估腹腔镜结直肠切除术的结果。
Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):94-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5183.
9
POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.用于急诊剖腹手术患者风险调整审计的POSSUM和P-POSSUM评分系统
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):500-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4465.
10
POSSUM models in open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.开放性腹主动脉瘤手术中的POSSUM模型
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.急诊剖腹手术术前风险评估工具的性能:一项系统评价。
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Oct 31;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.非创伤性腹部急症中的损伤控制手术:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)及曼海姆腹膜炎指数的预后价值
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01984-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
3
Evolution of damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal pathology: a light in the darkness.
非创伤性腹部病理学中损伤控制性手术的演变:黑暗中的曙光。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 30;52(2):e4194809. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4809. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
4
Abdominal and thoracic wall closure: damage control surgery's cinderella.腹部和胸壁关闭:损伤控制手术的灰姑娘。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 30;52(2):e4144777. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4777. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
5
Lessons from Trauma Care: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Damage Control Laparotomy in the Patient with Gastrointestinal Disease.创伤护理的经验教训:胃肠道疾病患者的腹腔间隔室综合征与损伤控制剖腹术
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3988-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
6
Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies.非创伤性腹部急症的损伤控制手术
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6.
7
Massive Small Bowel Infaction: A Comparison of Two Cases.大面积小肠梗死:两例病例对比
Gastroenterology Res. 2009 Aug;2(4):236-237. doi: 10.4021/gr2009.07.1302. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
8
Ilio-psoas hematoma in the intensive care unit: a multicentric study.重症监护病房中的髂腰肌血肿:一项多中心研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0106-z. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.评估风险:急诊剖腹手术中预后预测的评分系统。
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015 Dec;5(4):20. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0020-y. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
10
Role of damage control surgery in the treatment of Hinchey III and IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a tailored strategy.损伤控制手术在治疗欣奇 III 级和 IV 级乙状结肠憩室炎中的作用:一种定制策略。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(25):e184. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000184.