Höhler Sabine
Ber Wiss. 2014 Mar;37(1):60-77. doi: 10.1002/bewi.201401664.
This paper explores the relations between economy and ecology in the last quarter of the 20th century with the example of biodiversity. From its definition in the 1980s, the concept of biodiversity responded not only to conservational concerns but also to hopes and demands of economic profitability. The paper argues that archival systems of inventorying and surveying nature, the biodiversity database and the biodiversity portfolio, changed the view on nature from a resource to an investment. The paper studies the alliances of ecologists and environmental economists in managing nature according to economic principles of successful asset management, "diversification", with the aim to distribute risk, minimize ecological loss and maximize overall ecosystem performance. Finally, the paper discusses the assumptions and the consequences of transferring principles from financial risk management to landscape management. How has the substitution of the existential values of nature by shareholder value affected the relations between ecology, environment, and ecosystem conservation? Who gains and who looses in exchanging natural capital and financial capital, yields, and profits?
本文以生物多样性为例,探讨了20世纪最后25年经济与生态之间的关系。自20世纪80年代被定义以来,生物多样性概念不仅回应了保护方面的关切,也回应了经济盈利的希望和需求。本文认为,对自然进行清查和勘测的档案系统、生物多样性数据库以及生物多样性投资组合,将对自然的看法从一种资源转变为了一项投资。本文研究了生态学家和环境经济学家根据成功资产管理的经济原则“多样化”来管理自然的联盟,其目的是分散风险、将生态损失降至最低并使整体生态系统性能最大化。最后,本文讨论了将金融风险管理原则应用于景观管理的假设及后果。用股东价值取代自然的存在价值如何影响了生态、环境和生态系统保护之间的关系?在交换自然资本与金融资本、收益及利润的过程中,谁获利谁受损?