Vargas Gabriela M, Parmar Abhishek D, Sheffield Kristin M, Tamirisa Nina P, Brown Kimberly M, Riall Taylor S
Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Surgery, The University of California, Oakland, California.
J Surg Res. 2014 Sep;191(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.070. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
There is a paucity of data on the current management and outcomes of liver-directed therapy (LDT) in older patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes in use of LDT in the setting of improved chemotherapy.
We used Cancer Registry and linked Medicare claims to identify patients aged ≥66 y undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor and chemotherapy after presenting with stage IV CRC (2001-2007). LDT was defined as liver resection and/or ablation-embolization.
We identified 5500 patients. LDT was used in 34.9% of patients; liver resection was performed in 1686 patients (30.7%), and ablation-embolization in 554 patients (10.1%), with 322 patients having both resection and ablation-embolization. Use of LDT was negatively associated with increasing year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99), age >85 y (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82), and poor tumor differentiation (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.83). LDT was associated with improved survival (median 28.4 versus 21.1 mo, P < 0.0001); however, survival improved for all patients over time. We found a significant interaction between LDT and period of diagnosis and noted a greater survival improvement with LDT for those diagnosed in the late (2005-2007) period.
Older patients with stage IV CRC are experiencing improved survival over time, independent of age, comorbidity, and use of LDT. However, many older patients deemed to be appropriate candidates for resection of the primary tumor and receipt of systemic chemotherapy did not receive LDT. Our data suggest that improved patient selection may be positively impacting outcomes. Early referral and optimal selection of patients for LDT has the potential to further improve survival in older patients presenting with advanced colorectal cancer.
目前关于老年IV期结直肠癌(CRC)患者肝导向治疗(LDT)的管理和结局的数据较少。本研究的目的是评估在化疗改善的情况下LDT的治疗模式和结局。
我们使用癌症登记处的数据并关联医疗保险理赔记录,以识别年龄≥66岁、在出现IV期CRC后接受原发性肿瘤手术切除和化疗的患者(2001 - 2007年)。LDT定义为肝切除和/或消融 - 栓塞术。
我们共识别出5500例患者。34.9%的患者接受了LDT;1686例患者(30.7%)进行了肝切除,554例患者(10.1%)进行了消融 - 栓塞术,322例患者同时进行了切除和消融 - 栓塞术。LDT的使用与诊断年份增加呈负相关(比值比[OR]=0.96,95%置信区间[CI]0.93 - 0.99)、年龄>85岁(OR = 0.61,95% CI 0.45 - 0.82)以及肿瘤分化差(OR = 0.73,95% CI 0.64 - 0.83)。LDT与生存期改善相关(中位生存期28.4个月对21.1个月,P < 0.0001);然而,所有患者的生存期随时间均有所改善。我们发现LDT与诊断时期之间存在显著交互作用,并注意到对于在晚期(2005 - 2007年)诊断的患者,LDT带来的生存期改善更大。
老年IV期CRC患者的生存期随时间推移有所改善,与年龄、合并症及LDT的使用无关。然而,许多被认为适合进行原发性肿瘤切除和接受全身化疗的老年患者未接受LDT。我们的数据表明,改善患者选择可能对结局产生积极影响。早期转诊并优化LDT患者的选择有可能进一步提高老年晚期结直肠癌患者的生存期。