Tzeel Albert, Lawnicki Victor, Pemble Kim R
National Medical Director, HumanaOne, Clinical Leadership and Policy Development, Humana, Inc, Milwaukee, WI.
Econometrician, Business Intelligence and Informatics Competency Center, Humana, Inc, Louisville, KY.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2012 Sep;5(6):333-41.
Health information exchanges (HIEs) have already demonstrated direct value in controlling the costs associated with utilization of emergency department services and with inpatient admissions from the emergency department. HIEs may also affect inpatient admissions originating from outside of the emergency department.
To assess if a potential association exists between a community-based HIE being used in hospital emergency departments and inpatient admissions emanating from outside of the emergency department.
The study design was observational, with an eligible population of fully insured plan members who sought emergency department care on at least 2 occasions over the study period between December 2008 and March 2010. Utilization data, obtained from medical and pharmacy claims, were matched to a list of emergency department utilizers where HIE querying could have occurred. Of the eligible members, 1482 underwent propensity score matching to create two 325-member groups-(1) a test group in which the HIE database was queried for all members in all of their emergency department visits, and (2) a control group in which the HIE database was not queried for any of the members in any emergency department visit.
A post-propensity matching analysis showed that although the test group had more admissions per 1000 members overall (199 more admissions per 1000 members) than the control group, these admissions might have been more appropriate for inpatient treatment in general. The relative risk of an admission by the time of a first emergency department visit was 28% higher in the control group than the test group, although by the time of a second emergency department visit, it was only 8% lower in the control group. Moreover, test group admissions resulted in less time spent as inpatients, which was denoted by bed days per 1000 members (771 fewer bed days per 1000 members) and by average length of stay (4.27 days per admission for all admissions and 0.95 days per admission when catastrophic cases were removed).
Based on these results, HIE availability in the care of patients presenting to the emergency department is associated with fewer inpatient hospital days and a shorter length of stay, even when catastrophic cases are removed from the analysis. Although many factors can play a role in this finding, it is possible that HIE promotion of more appropriate hospital admissions from outside of the emergency department is one cause. Such "indirect" value shows that the return on investment found by HIEs may even be greater than previously calculated. Additional study is warranted to further the business case for HIE investment for the various stakeholders who are interested in supporting HIE sustainability.
健康信息交换(HIEs)已在控制与急诊科服务利用以及急诊科住院患者入院相关的成本方面展现出直接价值。HIEs 也可能影响源自急诊科之外的住院患者入院情况。
评估医院急诊科使用的基于社区的 HIE 与源自急诊科之外的住院患者入院之间是否存在潜在关联。
本研究设计为观察性研究,符合条件的人群为在 2008 年 12 月至 2010 年 3 月研究期间至少两次寻求急诊科护理的全额参保计划成员。从医疗和药房理赔记录中获取的利用数据与可能进行 HIE 查询的急诊科使用者名单进行匹配。在符合条件的成员中,1482 人进行了倾向得分匹配,以创建两个各有 325 名成员的组:(1)测试组,在其所有急诊科就诊中对所有成员查询 HIE 数据库;(2)对照组,在任何急诊科就诊中均不对任何成员查询 HIE 数据库。
倾向得分匹配后的分析表明,尽管测试组每 1000 名成员的总体入院人数比对照组多(每 1000 名成员多 199 例入院),但总体而言这些入院可能更适合住院治疗。在首次急诊科就诊时,对照组入院的相对风险比测试组高 28%,不过在第二次急诊科就诊时,对照组仅低 8%。此外,测试组的入院导致住院时间缩短,这体现在每 1000 名成员的住院天数(每 1000 名成员少 771 天)以及平均住院时长(所有入院的每次入院为 4.27 天,排除灾难性病例后每次入院为 0.95 天)上。
基于这些结果,即使在分析中排除灾难性病例,在急诊科就诊患者的护理中 HIE 的可用性仍与更少的住院天数和更短的住院时长相关。尽管许多因素可能在此发现中起作用,但 HIE 促进从急诊科之外进行更合适的住院患者入院可能是一个原因。这种“间接”价值表明 HIEs 发现的投资回报率甚至可能高于先前计算的结果。有必要进行进一步研究,为有兴趣支持 HIE 可持续性的各利益相关方推进 HIE 投资的商业案例。