Greenapple Rhonda
President, Reimbursement Intelligence, LLC, Madison, NJ.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2012 Mar;5(2):83-92.
Advances in therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly biologics, have transformed the treatment paradigm for RA. However, the associated costs of these therapies result in a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. As a chronic disease requiring lifelong treatment, most health plans now position RA drugs as a high-priority therapeutic category.
To identify provider and payer practices and perceptions regarding coverage of RA biologics in the current marketplace, as well as emerging trends in reimbursement practices.
In November 2011, Reimbursement Intelligence, a healthcare research company, collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data via parallel-structure online surveys of 100 rheumatologists and 50 health plan payers (medical and pharmacy directors) who represent more than 80 million covered lives. The surveys included approximately 150 questions, and the surveys were designed to force a response for each question.
Payers reported using tier placement, prior authorization, and contracting in determining coverage strategies for RA biologics. Among providers, experience with older RA agents remains the key driver for the choice of a biologic agent. A majority of payers and providers (68% and 54%, respectively) reported that they did not anticipate a change in the way their plans would manage biologics over the next 2 to 4 years. Payers' responses indicated uncertainty about how therapeutic positioning of newer, small-molecule drugs at price parity to biologics would affect the current reimbursement landscape. Survey responses show that approval of an indication for early treatment of RA is not likely to change the prescribing and reimbursement landscape for RA biologics. This survey further shows that payers and providers are generally aligned in terms of perceptions of current and future treatments for RA.
Advances in RA therapies allow patients increasing options for effective disease management. However, the high cost of biologic therapies and the need for lifelong treatment raise economic concerns. Payer satisfaction with current therapies and uncertainty about added value of new therapies will create challenges for new medications coming to market.
类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗方法的进步,尤其是生物制剂,已经改变了RA的治疗模式。然而,这些治疗方法的相关成本给医疗系统带来了巨大的经济负担。作为一种需要终身治疗的慢性病,大多数健康计划现在将RA药物列为高度优先治疗类别。
确定当前市场上医疗服务提供者和支付方在RA生物制剂覆盖范围方面的做法和看法,以及报销做法的新趋势。
2011年11月,医疗保健研究公司Reimbursement Intelligence通过对100名风湿病学家和50名健康计划支付方(医疗和药房主任)进行平行结构在线调查,收集并分析了定量和定性数据,这些支付方代表了超过8000万参保人群。调查包含约150个问题,且设计为每个问题都必须作答。
支付方报告称在确定RA生物制剂的覆盖策略时会使用层级安排、预先授权和合同约定。在医疗服务提供者中,使用过旧的RA药物的经验仍然是选择生物制剂的关键驱动因素。大多数支付方和医疗服务提供者(分别为68%和54%)报告称,他们预计在未来2至4年内其计划管理生物制剂的方式不会改变。支付方的回答表明,对于价格与生物制剂相当的新型小分子药物的治疗定位将如何影响当前报销格局存在不确定性。调查结果显示,RA早期治疗适应证的获批不太可能改变RA生物制剂的处方和报销格局。这项调查进一步表明,支付方和医疗服务提供者在对RA当前和未来治疗的看法上总体一致。
RA治疗方法的进步为患者提供了越来越多有效的疾病管理选择。然而,生物治疗的高成本和终身治疗的需求引发了经济方面的担忧。支付方对当前治疗的满意度以及对新疗法附加值的不确定性将给即将上市的新药物带来挑战。