Healy C Mary, Rench Marcia A, Wootton Susan H, Castagnini Luis A
From the *Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine; †Ben Taub General Hospital; ‡Center for Vaccine Awareness and Research, Texas Children's Hospital; and §University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Jan;34(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000486.
Tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis immunization of infant contacts (cocooning) is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prevent infant pertussis. We determined whether implementing a cocooning program at Ben Taub General Hospital, Houston, reduced severe pertussis in young infants.
Infants ≤6 months of age, diagnosed with pertussis (determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and microbiology records) at 4 hospitals, and born at times when only postpartum women (January 2008 through May 2009) and all infant contacts (June 2009 through August 2011) were offered tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine at Ben Taub General Hospital were compared with infants born preintervention (May 2004 through December 2007).
One hundred ninety-six (49%) infants with pertussis were born preintervention, 140 (35%) during maternal postpartum (PP) and 64 (16%) during cocooning (C) periods. Infants were similar in age at diagnosis (81.2 vs. 71.3 [PP] vs. 72.5 [C] days; P 0.07), sex (male 59% vs. 51% [PP] vs. 48% [C]; P 0.17), hospitalization (68% vs. 71% [PP] vs. 78% [C]; P 0.27) and outcome (2 deaths in the PP period; P 0.15), but more were admitted to intensive care units during cocooning (24% vs. 35% [PP] vs. 68% [C]; P < 0.001). Similar proportions of infants were born at Ben Taub General Hospital throughout the study (8% vs. 9% [PP] vs. 5% [C]; P 0.53).
Postpartum immunization and cocooning did not reduce pertussis illness in infants ≤6 months of age. Efforts should be directed toward increasing tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis immunization during pregnancy, combined with cocooning, to reduce life-threatening young infant pertussis.
美国疾病控制与预防中心建议对婴儿接触者进行破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳免疫接种(“围裹式”接种)以预防婴儿百日咳。我们确定在休斯顿本·陶布综合医院实施“围裹式”接种计划是否能减少小婴儿的重症百日咳。
将在4家医院诊断为百日咳(根据国际疾病分类第九版编码和微生物学记录确定)、出生于本·陶布综合医院仅对产后妇女(2008年1月至2009年5月)以及所有婴儿接触者(2009年6月至2011年8月)提供破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳疫苗期间的≤6月龄婴儿,与干预前出生(2004年5月至2007年12月)的婴儿进行比较。
196名(49%)患百日咳的婴儿在干预前出生,140名(35%)在产妇产后(PP)期间出生,64名(16%)在“围裹式”接种(C)期间出生。诊断时婴儿的年龄(81.2天对71.3天[PP]对72.5天[C];P = 0.07)、性别(男性59%对51%[PP]对48%[C];P = 0.17)、住院情况(68%对71%[PP]对78%[C];P = 0.27)和结局(PP期间2例死亡;P = 0.15)相似,但“围裹式”接种期间更多婴儿被收入重症监护病房(24%对35%[PP]对68%[C];P < 0.001)。在整个研究期间,在本·陶布综合医院出生的婴儿比例相似(8%对9%[PP]对5%[C];P = 0.53)。
产后免疫接种和“围裹式”接种并未减少≤6月龄婴儿的百日咳疾病。应致力于在孕期增加破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳免疫接种,并结合“围裹式”接种,以减少危及生命的小婴儿百日咳。