Liu Michael A, Huynh Ngoc-Tram, Broukhim Michael, Cheung Douglas H, Schuster Tonya L, Najm Wadie
1 Susan Samueli Center for Integrative Medicine, affiliated with School of Medicine, University of California , Irvine, Costa Mesa, CA.
J Altern Complement Med. 2014 Sep;20(9):718-26. doi: 10.1089/acm.2014.0041. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
To (1) determine the attitudes, perceptions, and use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among undergraduate students; (2) assess whether these students would benefit from more academic exposure to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and promotion of integrative medicine (IM); and (3) gauge the need and desire of undergraduates, particularly pre-health learners, to take courses about CAM/IM.
This cross-sectional electronic survey study was conducted on the campus of the University of California (UC) Irvine. Selection criteria included being at least 18 years of age and a current undergraduate at UC Irvine. All survey responses were collected between November 20, 2010, and June 1, 2011. The data were analyzed by using Stata software, version 11-SE (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).
Completed surveys were received from 2839 participants (mean age of respondents, 20.2 years). Thirty-five percent had used CAM within the past 12 months, and 92.8% believed CAM to be at least somewhat effective; however, only 31% had prior education on CAM. After adjustment for variables, familiarity and belief in effectiveness were both highly linked to the use of CAM, with ascending odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of 3.9 (3.1-4.9), 8.1 (5.7-11.5), 13.4 (6.0-30.2), 2.1 (1.3-3.4), 4.9 (3.0-7.8), and 12.7 (6.9-23.4) among increasing categories (all p<0.01). Sex (OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01-1.56]; p<0.05), Asian ethnicity (1.46 [1.14-1.88]; p<0.01), and prior education (1.26 [1.01-1.57]; p<0.05) were also significantly correlated to the use of CAM after adjustment. Most respondents indicated that they were likely to take a CAM college course if it fulfilled a graduation requirement (63.6%) or was offered within their major (56.4%).
Overall, this large-scale study supports the ideas that education plays a pivotal factor in the decision to use CAM and that there is a large demand for additional CAM knowledge among college students.
(1)确定本科生对补充医学、替代医学和整合医学的态度、认知及使用情况;(2)评估这些学生是否会从更多关于补充医学和替代医学(CAM)的学术接触以及整合医学(IM)的推广中受益;(3)衡量本科生,尤其是健康预科学生对选修CAM/IM课程的需求和意愿。
这项横断面电子调查研究在加利福尼亚大学欧文分校校园内进行。入选标准包括年龄至少18岁且为欧文分校的在校本科生。所有调查回复均在2010年11月20日至2011年6月1日期间收集。数据使用Stata软件11-SE版本(Stata公司,德克萨斯州大学站)进行分析。
共收到2839名参与者的完整调查问卷(受访者平均年龄20.2岁)。35%的人在过去12个月内使用过CAM,92.8%的人认为CAM至少有一定效果;然而,只有31%的人曾接受过关于CAM的教育。在对变量进行调整后,对CAM的熟悉程度和对其有效性的信念均与CAM的使用高度相关,随着类别增加,优势比(OR;95%置信区间[CI])分别为3.9(3.1 - 4.9)、8.1(5.7 - 11.5)、13.4(6.0 - 30.2)、2.1(1.3 - 3.4)、4.9(3.0 - 7.8)和12.7(6.9 - 23.4)(所有p<0.01)。调整后,性别(OR,1.26 [95% CI,1.01 - 1.56];p<0.05)、亚裔种族(1.46 [1.14 - 1.88];p<0.01)和先前教育(1.26 [1.01 - 1.57];p<0.05)也与CAM的使用显著相关。大多数受访者表示,如果CAM课程满足毕业要求(63.6%)或在其专业内开设(56.4%),他们可能会选修。
总体而言,这项大规模研究支持以下观点,即教育在使用CAM的决策中起关键作用,且大学生对更多CAM知识有很大需求。