Astur Diego Costa, Aleluia Vinicius, Veronese Ciro, Astur Nelson, Oliveira Saulo Gomes, Arliani Gustavo Gonçalves, Badra Ricardo, Kaleka Camila Cohen, Amaro Joicemar Tarouco, Cohen Moisés
Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina/UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Instituto Cohen, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Knee. 2014 Oct;21(5):911-5. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Current literature supports the thought that anesthesia and analgesia administered perioperatively for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have a great influence on time to effective rehabilitation during the first week after hospital discharge.
The aim of this study is to answer the research question is there a difference in clinical outcomes between the use of a femoral nerve block with spinal anesthesia versus spinal analgesia alone for people undergoing ACL reconstruction?
ACL reconstruction with spinal anesthesia and patient sedation (Group one); and spinal anesthesia with patient sedation and an additional femoral nerve block (Group two). Patients were re-evaluated for pain, range of motion (ROM), active contraction of the quadriceps, and a Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scoring scale.
Spinal anesthesia with a femoral nerve block demonstrates pain relief 6h after surgery (VAS 0.37; p=0.007). From the third (VAS=4.56; p=0.028) to the seventh (VAS=2.87; p=0.05) days after surgery, this same nerve blockage delivered higher pain scores. Patients had a similar progressive improvement on knee joint range of motion with or without femoral nerve block (p<0.002). Group one and two had 23.75 and 24.29° 6h after surgery and 87.81 and 85.36° of knee flexion after 48h post op.
Spinal anesthesia associated with a femoral nerve block had no additional benefits on pain control after the third postoperative day. There were no differences between groups concerning ability for knee flexion and to complete daily activities during postoperative period.
Randomized Clinical Trial Level I.
当前文献支持这样一种观点,即在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术围手术期给予的麻醉和镇痛对出院后第一周有效康复的时间有很大影响。
本研究的目的是回答研究问题,即对于接受ACL重建的患者,在脊髓麻醉基础上使用股神经阻滞与单纯脊髓镇痛相比,临床结果是否存在差异?
脊髓麻醉联合患者镇静进行ACL重建(第一组);脊髓麻醉联合患者镇静并额外进行股神经阻滞(第二组)。对患者进行疼痛、活动范围(ROM)、股四头肌主动收缩以及功能独立性测量(FIM)评分量表的重新评估。
脊髓麻醉联合股神经阻滞在术后6小时显示出疼痛缓解(视觉模拟评分[VAS]为0.37;p = 0.007)。从术后第三天(VAS = 4.56;p = 0.028)到第七天(VAS = 2.87;p = 0.05),同样的神经阻滞产生了更高的疼痛评分。无论有无股神经阻滞,患者膝关节活动范围均有类似的逐步改善(p < 0.002)。第一组和第二组术后6小时膝关节活动度分别为23.75°和24.29°,术后48小时膝关节屈曲度分别为87.81°和85.36°。
脊髓麻醉联合股神经阻滞在术后第三天后对疼痛控制没有额外益处。两组在术后膝关节屈曲能力和完成日常活动能力方面没有差异。
随机临床试验I级。