Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):2015-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Distinguishing between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastroesophageal reflux disease, and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is challenging. We assessed whether immunohistochemical analysis of esophageal tissues for major basic protein (MBP), eotaxin-3, and tryptase can be used for diagnosis of EoE and to differentiate EoE from PPI-REE.
We conducted a prospective study of 196 consecutive adults who underwent outpatient endoscopy at the University of North Carolina from 2009 through 2012. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or dysphagia served as controls. PPI-REE was defined as a symptomatic and histologic response to a PPI. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify MBP, eotaxin-3, and tryptase. The maximum density of epithelial staining was determined for each assay; levels were compared between EoE and control groups and then EoE and PPI-REE groups, and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed.
Esophageal tissues from patients with EoE (n = 50) had a median 951 MBP-positive cells/mm(2), whereas those from controls (n = 123) had a median 2 MBP-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Samples from patients with EoE had a median 155 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2), and those from controls (n = 123) had 18 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Samples from patients with EoE had a median 249 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2), and those from controls (n = 123) had 11 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2) (P < .001). Levels of MBP, eotaxin-3, tryptase, and the combination of all 3 identified patients with EoE with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.99, 0.94, 0.99, and 1.00. Analyses of only samples with eosinophil counts of 10-100 eosinophils per high-power field produced similar results. No marker distinguished EoE from PPI-REE. Esophageal tissues from patients with PPI-REE (n = 23) had 987 MBP-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .18, compared with EoE), 160 eotaxin-3-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .33), and 243 tryptase-positive cells/mm(2) (P = .28).
Esophageal tissues from patients with EoE have substantially higher levels of MBP, eotaxin-3, and tryptase than controls on the basis of immunohistochemical analysis. Assays for the 3 markers identify patients with EoE with 100% accuracy but cannot distinguish EoE from PPI-REE.
区分嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)、胃食管反流病(GERD)和质子泵抑制剂反应性食管嗜酸性粒细胞增多症(PPI-REE)具有挑战性。我们评估了食管组织中主要碱性蛋白(MBP)、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 和类胰蛋白酶的免疫组织化学分析是否可用于 EoE 的诊断,并用于区分 EoE 和 PPI-REE。
我们对 2009 年至 2012 年期间在北卡罗来纳大学进行门诊内镜检查的 196 例连续成年患者进行了前瞻性研究。根据共识指南诊断 EoE 新发病例。胃食管反流病或吞咽困难患者作为对照。PPI-REE 定义为对 PPI 的症状和组织学反应。进行免疫组织化学检测以定量 MBP、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 和类胰蛋白酶。确定每种检测的上皮染色最大密度;比较 EoE 组和对照组、EoE 组和 PPI-REE 组之间的水平,并构建受试者工作特征曲线。
EoE 患者(n=50)的食管组织中 MBP 阳性细胞中位数为 951 个/mm²,而对照组(n=123)为 2 个/mm²(P<0.001)。EoE 患者的组织样本中 MBP 阳性细胞中位数为 155 个/mm²,而对照组(n=123)为 18 个/mm²(P<0.001)。EoE 患者的组织样本中 MBP 阳性细胞中位数为 249 个/mm²,而对照组(n=123)为 11 个/mm²(P<0.001)。MBP、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3、类胰蛋白酶和这 3 种标志物的组合,对 EoE 患者的检测,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.99、0.94、0.99 和 1.00。对嗜酸性粒细胞计数为 10-100 个/高倍视野的样本进行分析,得到了相似的结果。没有标志物可以区分 EoE 和 PPI-REE。PPI-REE 患者(n=23)的食管组织中 MBP 阳性细胞中位数为 987 个/mm²(与 EoE 相比,P=0.18)、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 阳性细胞中位数为 160 个/mm²(P=0.33)和类胰蛋白酶阳性细胞中位数为 243 个/mm²(P=0.28)。
基于免疫组织化学分析,EoE 患者的食管组织中 MBP、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 和类胰蛋白酶的水平明显高于对照组。这 3 种标志物的检测方法可 100%准确地识别 EoE 患者,但不能区分 EoE 和 PPI-REE。