Uhrenbacher Julia, Schmidlin Patrick R, Keul Christine, Eichberger Marlis, Roos Malgorzata, Gernet Wolfgang, Stawarczyk Bogna
Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Professor and Head of Periodontology, Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
The mechanical properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) make it an ideal material for fixed dental prostheses; however, insufficient information is available about the cementation of these restorations.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention strength of differently pretreated and conditioned PEEK crowns luted to dental abutments.
Human teeth were prepared in a standardized manner, and PEEK crowns were milled (N=160, n=10 per group) and conditioned as follows: airborne-particle abrasion, sulfuric etching, piranha etching, and no conditioning. These groups were divided into adhesive systems: visio.link, Signum PEEK Bond, Ambarino P60, and no adhesive and luted to dentin abutments. After water storage (60 days) and thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5°C/55°C), the retention strength of the crowns was determined with a pull-off test, and failure types were classified. The data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis, 1-way ANOVA, and χ(2) test (α=.05).
Crowns that were unconditioned and piranha etched and/or adhesively untreated or pretreated with Ambarino P60 had the lowest retention strength. The highest values were found for the airborne-particle abrasion and sulfuric etched groups and/or crowns adhesively pretreated with Signum PEEK Bond and visio.link. Composite resin cement that remained on dentin was observed more frequently for unconditioned groups in combination with Ambarino P60 and no adhesive pretreatment. Mixed failure types were found more frequently in the airborne-particle abrasion group in combination with visio.link, Signum PEEK Bond, and no adhesive pretreatment, in the sulfuric acid etched group combined with Ambarino P60 and no adhesive pretreatment, and after the piranha acid pretreatment in combination with visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond.
The adhesion of the tested PEEK crowns to dentin was satisfactory after treatment with airborne-particle abrasion or etching with sulfuric acid and/or when additional adhesive systems such as visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond were used.
聚醚醚酮(PEEK)的机械性能使其成为固定义齿的理想材料;然而,关于这些修复体粘固的信息不足。
本研究的目的是评估不同预处理和处理后的PEEK冠粘结到牙基台上的固位强度。
以标准化方式制备人牙,并铣制PEEK冠(N = 160,每组n = 10),并进行如下处理:空气颗粒喷砂、硫酸蚀刻、过硫酸蚀刻,以及不进行处理。这些组再分为粘结系统:visio.link、Signum PEEK Bond、Ambarino P60,以及不使用粘结剂,并粘结到牙本质基台上。在水储存(60天)和热循环(5000次循环,5°C/55°C)后,通过拉伸试验测定冠的固位强度,并对失败类型进行分类。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、单因素方差分析和χ²检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。
未经处理、过硫酸蚀刻和/或未进行粘结处理或用Ambarino P60预处理的冠固位强度最低。空气颗粒喷砂和硫酸蚀刻组以及/或用Signum PEEK Bond和visio.link进行粘结预处理的冠的固位强度最高。在未经处理的组与Ambarino P60和未进行粘结预处理组合时,观察到复合树脂粘结剂在牙本质上残留的情况更为频繁。在空气颗粒喷砂组与visio.link、Signum PEEK Bond和未进行粘结预处理组合时、硫酸蚀刻组与Ambarino P60和未进行粘结预处理组合时,以及过硫酸预处理后与visio.link或Signum PEEK Bond组合时,混合失败类型更为常见。
经过空气颗粒喷砂处理或硫酸蚀刻处理,和/或使用额外的粘结系统如visio.link或Signum PEEK Bond后,测试的PEEK冠与牙本质的粘结效果令人满意。