Merkatz Ruth B, Plagianos Marlena, Hoskin Elena, Cooney Michael, Hewett Paul C, Mensch Barbara S
Population Council, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Population Council, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Contraception. 2014 Nov;90(5):514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Develop and test a theoretical acceptability model for the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR); explore whether domains of use within the model predict satisfaction, method adherence and CVR continuation.
Four domains of use were considered relative to outcome markers of acceptability, that is, method satisfaction, adherence and continuation. A questionnaire to evaluate subjects' experiences relative to the domains, their satisfaction (Likert scale) and adherence to instructions for use was developed and administered to 1036 women enrolled in a 13-cycle Phase 3 trial. Method continuation was documented from the trial database. Stepwise logistic regression (LR) analysis was conducted and odds ratios (ORs) calculated to assess associations of satisfaction with questions from the four domains. Fisher's Exact Test was used to determine the association of satisfaction with outcome measures.
A final acceptability model was developed based on the following determinants of CVR satisfaction: ease of use, side effects, expulsions/feeling the CVR and sexual activity including physical effects during intercourse. Satisfaction was high (89%) and related to higher method adherence [OR, 2.6 (1.3, 5.2)] and continuation [OR, 5.5 (3.5, 8.4)]. According to the LR analysis, attributes of CVR use representing items from the four domains - finding it easy to remove, not complaining of side effects, not feeling the CVR while wearing it and experiencing no change or an increase in sexual pleasure and/or frequency - were associated with higher odds of satisfaction.
Hypothesized domains of CVR use were related to satisfaction, which was associated with adherence and continuation. Results provide a scientific basis for introduction and future research.
Acceptability research is important when introducing a new method of contraception and determining whether it can be a successful option in meeting the reproductive health needs of women and men. This study was designed to test a conceptual model of acceptability and identify factors associated with successful use of a new contraceptive delivery modality. Original research was conducted for this publication.
开发并测试炔诺酮肟/炔雌醇避孕阴道环(CVR)的理论可接受性模型;探讨该模型中的使用领域是否能预测满意度、方法依从性和CVR持续使用情况。
相对于可接受性的结果指标,即方法满意度、依从性和持续使用情况,考虑了四个使用领域。编制了一份问卷,以评估受试者在这些领域的经历、他们的满意度(李克特量表)以及对使用说明的依从性,并对参与一项为期13个周期的3期试验的1036名女性进行了问卷调查。从试验数据库中记录方法持续使用情况。进行逐步逻辑回归(LR)分析并计算比值比(OR),以评估满意度与来自四个领域的问题之间的关联。使用Fisher精确检验来确定满意度与结果指标之间的关联。
基于以下CVR满意度决定因素建立了最终的可接受性模型:使用方便性、副作用、排出/感觉到CVR以及包括性交期间身体影响在内的性活动。满意度较高(89%),且与更高的方法依从性[OR,2.6(1.3,5.2)]和持续使用情况[OR,5.5(3.5,8.4)]相关。根据LR分析,代表四个领域项目的CVR使用属性——发现易于取出、未抱怨有副作用、佩戴时未感觉到CVR以及性快感和/或频率无变化或增加——与更高的满意度几率相关。
假设的CVR使用领域与满意度相关,而满意度又与依从性和持续使用情况相关。研究结果为引入该方法及未来研究提供了科学依据。
在引入一种新的避孕方法并确定其是否能成为满足男女生殖健康需求的成功选择时,可接受性研究很重要。本研究旨在测试一个可接受性概念模型,并确定与成功使用一种新的避孕给药方式相关联的因素。本出版物进行了原创性研究。