提高标准。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Raising the bar.

作者信息

McNutt Marcia

机构信息

Marcia McNutt is Editor-in-Chief of Science.

出版信息

Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):9. doi: 10.1126/science.1257891.

DOI:10.1126/science.1257891

PMID:24994623

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Raising the bar.

Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):9. doi: 10.1126/science.1257891.

Raising the bar for acceptance; new length restrictions on Epilepsia manuscripts.

Epilepsia. 2009 Apr;50(4):585. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02085.x.

So you want your article to be published!

Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Feb;17(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00691.x.

Let's think about cognitive bias.

Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):163. doi: 10.1038/526163a.

[Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].

Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3458.

Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005 Apr;32(4):324-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x.

Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.

BJOG. 2013 Jul;120(8):915-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12219.

Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known.

Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):10-1. doi: 10.1111/add.12728.

All the lonely people: by Caveman.

J Cell Sci. 2004 Aug 1;117(Pt 17):3705-6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01321.

[How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].

Lakartidningen. 2004 Dec 23;101(51-52):4250.

引用本文的文献

PNAS establishes a Statistical Review Committee.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2317870120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317870120. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'.

Elife. 2018 Dec 21;7:e36163. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36163.

Common Statistical Pitfalls in Basic Science Research.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 29;5(10):e004142. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004142.

Transparent reporting of research results in eLife.

Elife. 2016 Sep 9;5:e21070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21070.

Helping to drive the robustness of preclinical research - the assay capability tool.

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Aug;3(4):e00162. doi: 10.1002/prp2.162. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Coping with the Conflict-of-Interest Pandemic by Listening to and Doubting Everyone, Including Yourself.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9658-9. Epub 2015 May 30.

Raising the bar for reproducible science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.

Toxicol Sci. 2015 May;145(1):16-22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv020. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Is medical research in danger of suffering the same fate as the NHS?

QJM. 2015 Jul;108(7):519-22. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu163. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Raising the bar.

Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):9. doi: 10.1126/science.1257891.

Raising the bar for acceptance; new length restrictions on Epilepsia manuscripts.

Epilepsia. 2009 Apr;50(4):585. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02085.x.

So you want your article to be published!

Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Feb;17(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00691.x.

Let's think about cognitive bias.

Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):163. doi: 10.1038/526163a.

[Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].

Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3458.

Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005 Apr;32(4):324-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x.

Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.

BJOG. 2013 Jul;120(8):915-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12219.

Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known.

Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):10-1. doi: 10.1111/add.12728.

All the lonely people: by Caveman.

J Cell Sci. 2004 Aug 1;117(Pt 17):3705-6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01321.

[How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].

Lakartidningen. 2004 Dec 23;101(51-52):4250.

引用本文的文献

PNAS establishes a Statistical Review Committee.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2317870120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317870120. Epub 2023 Nov 15.

Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'.

Elife. 2018 Dec 21;7:e36163. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36163.

Common Statistical Pitfalls in Basic Science Research.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 29;5(10):e004142. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004142.

Transparent reporting of research results in eLife.

Elife. 2016 Sep 9;5:e21070. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21070.

Helping to drive the robustness of preclinical research - the assay capability tool.

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Aug;3(4):e00162. doi: 10.1002/prp2.162. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Coping with the Conflict-of-Interest Pandemic by Listening to and Doubting Everyone, Including Yourself.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9658-9. Epub 2015 May 30.

Raising the bar for reproducible science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.

Toxicol Sci. 2015 May;145(1):16-22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv020. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Is medical research in danger of suffering the same fate as the NHS?

QJM. 2015 Jul;108(7):519-22. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu163. Epub 2014 Aug 18.