Kira Ibrahim A, Lewandowski Linda, Ashby Jeffrey S, Templin Thomas, Ramaswamy Vidya, Mohanesh Jamal
Ibrahim A. Kira, PhD, Center for Cumulative Trauma Studies, Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Linda Lewandowski, PhD, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2014 Jul;20(4):250-266. doi: 10.1177/1078390314542873. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
Understanding the dynamics of mental health stigma through existing frameworks, especially in minorities with higher stigma, is problematic. There is a need to reconceptualize stigma, particularly in highly traumatized groups. The current study examines the validity of a new development-based trauma framework that conceptualizes stigma as a type III chronic trauma that contributes to negative mental health effects. This framework proposes that public stigma is a unique chronic traumatic stress that mediates the effects of similar trauma types in mental health patients. To test this proposition, this study explores the relationships between internalized stigma of mental illness (ISMI), different trauma types, and posttrauma spectrum disorders. ISMI, posttraumatic stress disorder, other posttrauma spectrum disorders, and cumulative trauma measures were administered to a sample of 399 mental health patients that included Arab (82%), Muslim (84%), and refugee (31%), as well as American patients (18%). Age in the sample ranged from 18 to 76 years (M = 39.66, SD = 11.45), with 53.5% males. Hierarchical multiple regression, t tests, and path analyses were conducted. Results indicated that ISMI predicted posttraumatic stress disorder and other posttrauma spectrum disorders after controlling for cumulative trauma. ISMI was associated with other chronic collective identity traumas. While Arab Americans, Muslims, and refugees had higher ISMI scores than other Americans, the elevated chronic trauma levels of these groups were significant predictors of these differences. The results provide evidence to support ISMI traumatology model. Implications of the results for treating victims of ISMI, especially Arab Americans, Muslims and refugees are discussed.
通过现有框架来理解心理健康污名化的动态,尤其是在污名化程度较高的少数群体中,是存在问题的。有必要重新概念化污名,特别是在遭受高度创伤的群体中。本研究考察了一种基于新发展的创伤框架的有效性,该框架将污名概念化为一种III型慢性创伤,会对心理健康产生负面影响。该框架提出,公众污名是一种独特的慢性创伤性应激,它介导了心理健康患者中类似创伤类型的影响。为了验证这一命题,本研究探讨了内化的精神疾病污名(ISMI)、不同创伤类型与创伤后谱系障碍之间的关系。对399名心理健康患者进行了ISMI、创伤后应激障碍、其他创伤后谱系障碍和累积创伤测量,这些患者包括阿拉伯人(82%)、穆斯林(84%)、难民(31%)以及美国患者(18%)。样本年龄在18至76岁之间(M = 39.66,SD = 11.45),男性占53.5%。进行了分层多元回归、t检验和路径分析。结果表明,在控制累积创伤后,ISMI可预测创伤后应激障碍和其他创伤后谱系障碍。ISMI与其他慢性集体身份创伤有关。虽然阿拉伯裔美国人、穆斯林和难民的ISMI得分高于其他美国人,但这些群体较高的慢性创伤水平是这些差异的重要预测因素。研究结果为支持ISMI创伤学模型提供了证据。讨论了研究结果对治疗ISMI受害者,特别是阿拉伯裔美国人、穆斯林和难民的意义。