Verma Deepika, Kishore Sachin, Siddique M E
Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital , Bareilly, India .
Professor and HOD, Department of Microbiology, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital , Bareilly, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May;8(5):DC41-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7745.4403. Epub 2014 May 15.
Malaria and Typhoid are two major infectious diseases, still prevalent in most of the tropical countries including India. Millions of individuals residing in these endemic cases contact these diseases either concurrently or as acute infection superimposed on a chronic one.
Diagnosis and comparative evaluation of various tests for diagnosis of Typhoid- Malaria co-infection in patients suffering from febrile illness.
Around 800 patients of both Out Patient Department (OPD) and In Patient Department (IPD) were referred to microbiology lab for Widal test/ Typhi dot IgG/IgM and Malaria card test between July 2012- September 2012. Patients found to be suffering from co-infection were further confirmed for typhoid by blood culture. Those patients who were found sterile on blood culture were further confirmed by stool culture. Patients positive by Malaria card test (either antibody or antigen or both) were confirmed by peripheral blood smear examination for malaria parasite by both thick and thin smear examination.
68 (8.5%) patients were found to be suffering from co- infection by the above tests. Blood culture revealed 15 (22%) bacterial pathogens in the widal positive patients out of which 6(8.8%) were Salmonella Typhi and 3 (4.41%) were Salmonella Paratyphi A. Stool culture revealed 8 (11.7%) S.Typhi and 5 (7.35%) S. Paratyphi A cases. Out of 68 patients positive by Malaria card test, only 36 (52.94%) showed Malaria parasite in peripheral blood smear also. Thus the no. of confirmed cases of co-infection was found to be only 1.6%.
The interpretation of Widal test and Malaria card test, when diagnosing concurrent malaria and typhoid fever, must therefore be done with a lot of caution. Negative or positive Widal agglutination test is neither definitive nor completely informative. Similarly erroneous interpretation of Malaria card test (especially Antibody detection card test) result may lead to prolonged treatment and economic burden on patient.
疟疾和伤寒是两种主要的传染病,在包括印度在内的大多数热带国家仍然普遍存在。数百万居住在这些地方病流行地区的人同时感染这些疾病,或者是在慢性感染的基础上叠加急性感染。
对发热性疾病患者中伤寒 - 疟疾合并感染的各种诊断测试进行诊断和比较评估。
2012年7月至2012年9月期间,约800名门诊(OPD)和住院部(IPD)患者被转诊至微生物实验室进行肥达试验/伤寒斑点IgG/IgM和疟疾卡试验。通过血培养进一步确认发现患有合并感染的患者是否感染伤寒。血培养无菌的患者通过粪便培养进一步确认。疟疾卡试验呈阳性(抗体或抗原或两者皆有)的患者通过厚涂片和薄涂片检查外周血涂片以检测疟原虫来进行确认。
通过上述测试发现68名(8.5%)患者患有合并感染。血培养在肥达试验阳性患者中发现15种(22%)细菌病原体,其中6种(8.8%)是伤寒沙门氏菌,3种(4.41%)是甲型副伤寒沙门氏菌。粪便培养发现8例(11.7%)伤寒沙门氏菌和5例(7.35%)甲型副伤寒沙门氏菌病例。在68名疟疾卡试验呈阳性的患者中,只有36名(52.94%)在外周血涂片中也显示有疟原虫。因此,确诊的合并感染病例数仅为1.6%。
因此,在诊断同时存在的疟疾和伤寒热时,对肥达试验和疟疾卡试验的解读必须非常谨慎。肥达凝集试验阴性或阳性既不是决定性的,也不是完全信息性的。同样,对疟疾卡试验(尤其是抗体检测卡试验)结果的错误解读可能会导致治疗时间延长和患者的经济负担。