• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国荷斯坦奶牛最终得分的基因组评估中,通过分配未知亲本群体来减少偏差。

Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.

作者信息

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Lourenco D A L, Lawlor T J

机构信息

Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5814-21. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7821. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2013-7821
PMID:24997668
Abstract

Assigning unknown parent groups (UPG) in mixed-model equations using single-step genomic BLUP was investigated to reduce bias and to increase accuracy in genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). The original UPG were defined based on the animal's birth year and the sex of the animal's unknown parents. Combining the last 2 UPG for the animals' birth years and separating the UPG for US and non-US Holsteins were considered in the redefinition. A full data set in the 2011 national genetic evaluation of final score in US Holsteins was used to calculate estimated breeding values (EBV) for validation, and a subset of the 2011 data, which excluded phenotypes recorded after 2007, was used to calculate GEBV for all animals, including 34,500 genotyped bulls. The EBV and GEBV in 2007 were compared with EBV in the 2011 full data. The last group effects for unknown sires and dams were overestimated with the GEBV model using the reduced 2007 data. The genetic trends from EBV in 2011 and GEBV in 2007 with the original UPG in the last few years demonstrated inflation, whereas GEBV with the redefined UPG by combining the last 2 groups showed deflation. On the other hand, the redefined UPG by separating for US and non-US Holsteins reduced the bias in GEBV. Regression coefficients smaller than unity for GEBV for young genotyped bulls with no daughters in 2007 on progeny deviations in 2011 also indicated inflation. The redefining of UPG reduced bias and slightly increased accuracy in GEBV for both US and non-US genotyped bulls. Rank correlations between GEBV in 2007 and in 2011 with the redefined UPG were higher than those with no UPG and the original UPG, especially for non-US bulls. Redefining of UPG in genomic evaluation could improve reliability of GEBV and provide correct genetic trends.

摘要

研究了在使用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)的混合模型方程中分配未知亲本组(UPG),以减少偏差并提高基因组估计育种值(GEBV)的准确性。原始的UPG是根据动物的出生年份和动物未知亲本的性别定义的。重新定义时考虑了将动物出生年份的最后两个UPG合并,以及将美国和非美国荷斯坦牛的UPG分开。使用2011年美国荷斯坦牛最终评分的全国遗传评估中的完整数据集来计算估计育种值(EBV)以进行验证,并使用2011年数据的一个子集(排除2007年之后记录的表型)来计算所有动物的GEBV,包括34500头基因分型公牛。将2007年的EBV和GEBV与2011年完整数据中的EBV进行比较。使用缩减的2007年数据的GEBV模型高估了未知父系和母系的最后一组效应。过去几年中,2011年的EBV和2007年使用原始UPG的GEBV显示出遗传趋势膨胀,而通过合并最后两组重新定义UPG的GEBV则显示出下降。另一方面,通过将美国和非美国荷斯坦牛分开重新定义UPG减少了GEBV中的偏差。2007年没有女儿的年轻基因分型公牛的GEBV对2011年后代偏差的回归系数小于1也表明存在膨胀。UPG的重新定义减少了美国和非美国基因分型公牛的GEBV偏差并略微提高了准确性。2007年和2011年使用重新定义UPG的GEBV之间的秩相关高于没有UPG和原始UPG的情况,特别是对于非美国公牛。在基因组评估中重新定义UPG可以提高GEBV的可靠性并提供正确的遗传趋势。

相似文献

1
Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.在美国荷斯坦奶牛最终得分的基因组评估中,通过分配未知亲本群体来减少偏差。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5814-21. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7821. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
2
Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.控制年轻基因型公牛基因组育种值中的偏差。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):9956-9970. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16789. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.美国荷斯坦牛未知父系群体的产量性状的基因组预测。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 May;104(5):5843-5853. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19789. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.短讯:美国荷斯坦奶牛综合评分的基因组评估受益于奶牛基因型的纳入。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3332-5. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6272. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
5
Application of single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model with unknown-parent groups for type traits in Japanese Holsteins.应用一步法单核苷酸最佳线性无偏预测模型(用于未知亲本群体的日本荷斯坦牛的类型性状)。
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Jul;106(7):4847-4859. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22541. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.邀请评论:单步基因组 BLUP 中的未知亲本群体和元发现者。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Feb;105(2):923-939. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20293. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.基因组评估在新西兰奶牛中的应用。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jan;98(1):659-75. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8560. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
8
Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?对年轻的基因分型动物的评估是否受益于过去几代?
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3930-42. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.通过与更大的群体相结合对相对较小的奶牛群体进行基因组评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4945-55. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9086. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.单步基因组模型提高了丹麦泽西牛基因组预测的可靠性并减少了偏差。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Dec;98(12):9026-34. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9703. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining large broiler populations into a single genomic evaluation: dealing with genetic divergence.将大型肉鸡群体合并进行单一基因组评估:应对遗传差异。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae360.
2
Genomic Regions Associated with Resistance to Gastrointestinal Parasites in Australian Merino Sheep.与澳大利亚美利奴绵羊抗胃肠道寄生虫相关的基因组区域。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;15(7):846. doi: 10.3390/genes15070846.
3
Genomic Selection Using Single-Step Genomic BLUP on the Number of Services per Conception Trait in Thai-Holstein Crossbreeds.
在泰国荷斯坦杂交品种中,基于每次受孕服务次数性状,使用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法进行基因组选择
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;13(23):3609. doi: 10.3390/ani13233609.
4
Genomic evaluation of commercial herds with different pedigree structures using the single-step genomic BLUP in Nelore cattle.使用单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法对具有不同系谱结构的内洛尔牛商业牛群进行基因组评估。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Feb 21;55(2):95. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03508-4.
5
Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.校正挪威红牛单步基因组预测中基础群体差异和未知父群。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac227.
6
Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions.元奠基者可能会减少复合牛基因组预测中的偏差。
Front Genet. 2021 Aug 20;12:678587. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.678587. eCollection 2021.
7
Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.猪的生长、肉质和胴体性状的遗传参数和纯繁杂交遗传相关。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa379.
8
Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.从理论到实践的单步基因组评估:在 BLUPF90 中使用 SNP 芯片和序列数据。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jul 14;11(7):790. doi: 10.3390/genes11070790.
9
Current status of genomic evaluation.基因组评估的现状。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr 1;98(4). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa101.
10
Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.使用模拟数据在不同不确定父系情况下单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法的应用
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0181752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181752. eCollection 2017.