Yang Xiao-Ping, Han Yue-Dong, Ye Jian-Jun, Chen Gang, Luo Ying, Ma Hong-Xia, Yu Xue-Wen, Niu Juan-Qin, Ren Fang-Yuan, Guo You-Ming
Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Medical College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China E-mail :
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(12):5089-95. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.12.5089.
As a common and essential contrast medium at present, gadobenate dimeglumine has shown better performance than some other agents when applied to Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening (Breast MRI Screening). Nevertheless, reports on the diagnostic performance of these two mediums (gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine) are not completely consistent.
To assess the diagnostic value of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for Breast MRI Screening in patients suffering from breast cancer and to provide more convinced evidence to guide clinical practice in terms of appropriate contrast agents.
Original articles in English and Chinese published before January 2013 were selected from available databases (The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Full-text Database, Chinese Journal Full-text). The criteria for inclusion and exclusion were based on the standard for diagnosis tests. Meta-Disc software (Version 1.4) was used for data analysis. Then, the area under curve (AUC) of SROC and the spearman rank correlation of sensitivity against (1-specificity) were calculated.
Total of 17 researches involving 1934 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine were 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) and 0.93 (0.88, 1.00) respectively. The pooled specificity for these two contrast agents were 0.924 (0.902, 0.943) and 0.838 (0.817, 0.858) respectively, and the AUC of SROC curve were 0.9781 and 0.9215 respectively.
Gadobenate dimeglumine can be regarded as a more effective and feasible contrast medium for Breast MRI Screening. At least 5% differences in diagnostic performance are usually considered as clinically relevant.
钆贝葡胺作为目前一种常用且重要的造影剂,在应用于乳腺磁共振成像筛查(乳腺MRI筛查)时,已显示出比其他一些造影剂更好的性能。然而,关于这两种造影剂(钆贝葡胺和钆喷酸葡胺)诊断性能的报道并不完全一致。
评估钆贝葡胺和钆喷酸葡胺对乳腺癌患者乳腺MRI筛查的诊断价值,并提供更具说服力的证据,以指导在选择合适造影剂方面的临床实践。
从现有数据库(考克兰图书馆、PUBMED、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国科学期刊全文数据库、中国期刊全文数据库)中选取2013年1月以前发表的中英文原始文章。纳入和排除标准基于诊断试验标准。采用Meta-Disc软件(1.4版)进行数据分析。然后,计算SROC曲线下面积(AUC)以及敏感度与(1-特异度)的Spearman等级相关性。
共纳入17项研究,涉及1934例患者。钆贝葡胺和钆喷酸葡胺的合并敏感度分别为0.99(0.97,1.00)和0.93(0.88,1.00)。这两种造影剂的合并特异度分别为0.924(0.902,0.943)和0.838(0.817,0.858),SROC曲线的AUC分别为0.9781和0.9215。
钆贝葡胺可被视为乳腺MRI筛查中一种更有效且可行的造影剂。通常认为诊断性能至少5%的差异具有临床相关性。