Tokunaka Mayumi, Hasegawa Junichi, Oba Tomohiro, Nakamura Masamitsu, Matsuoka Ryu, Ichizuka Kiyotake, Otsuki Katsufumi, Okai Takashi, Sekizawa Akihiko
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jun;28(9):1061-3. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.942633. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
To clarify which types of cervical polyp removed during the first and second trimester are associated with the risk of spontaneous abortion and preterm delivery.
Pregnant females who underwent attempted polypectomy of cervical polyps during pregnancy and delivered singleton infants between 2005 and 2011 were evaluated. The clinical courses and outcomes of preterm delivery after polypectomy stratified according to the pathologic diagnosis of the polyps were retrospectively reviewed. The removed polyps were classified into decidual polyps and endocervical polyps.
The pathological diagnoses included 41 decidual polyps and 42 endocervical polyps. No malignant polyps were found. The removal of decidual polyps during pregnancy carried a higher risk of spontaneous abortion (12.2% versus 0%, p = 0.026) and preterm delivery (34.2% versus 4.8%, p = 0.001) than that of endocervical polyps. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, risk factors for preterm delivery before 37 weeks' gestation were the presence of decidual polyps and a history of preterm delivery.
The risk of abortion and preterm delivery associated with polypectomy during pregnancy is greater in patients with decidual polyps. It might be safer not to remove cervical polyps during pregnancy, except in cases in which the polyps are suspected to be malignant.
明确妊娠早期和中期切除的哪些类型的宫颈息肉与自然流产和早产风险相关。
对2005年至2011年间孕期接受宫颈息肉切除手术并分娩单胎婴儿的孕妇进行评估。根据息肉的病理诊断,对息肉切除术后早产的临床过程和结局进行回顾性分析。切除的息肉分为蜕膜息肉和宫颈内膜息肉。
病理诊断包括41例蜕膜息肉和42例宫颈内膜息肉。未发现恶性息肉。与宫颈内膜息肉相比,孕期切除蜕膜息肉的自然流产风险(12.2%对0%,p = 0.026)和早产风险(34.2%对4.8%,p = 0.001)更高。根据多因素逻辑回归分析,妊娠37周前早产的危险因素是存在蜕膜息肉和早产史。
蜕膜息肉患者孕期息肉切除相关的流产和早产风险更高。除非怀疑息肉为恶性,孕期不切除宫颈息肉可能更安全。