Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Department of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100006, China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):1945-1950. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07583-2. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of cervical polypectomy performed via vaginoscopy in pregnant women.
Pregnant patients diagnosed with cervical polyps were retrospectively included in Beijing Tiantan Hospital between April 2017 and April 2023. Group A underwent cervical polypectomy using a vaginoscopy technique without speculum, cervical forceps and anesthesia, while Group B received conservative management. The incidence of spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, preterm rupture of membranes (PROM), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, timing and method of delivery, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.
Of 90 pregnant patients included in the study, 48 patients receiving polypectomy under vaginoscopy were included into group A while 42 patients receiving conservative treatment were assigned into group B. At baseline, group A exhibited higher rates of vaginal bleeding pre-operation, as well as larger cervical polyp dimensions compared to group B. The median interval between vaginal bleeding and polypectomy was 3.5 weeks, with the median procedure typically performed at gestational week 19 in group A. There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous abortion between the two groups (4.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000). However, group A showed a significantly lower frequency of preterm birth (4.2% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.030) and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (18.8% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.025) compared to group B. No disparities were observed in the timing, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes between the two groups.
The utilization of vaginoscopy for cervical polypectomy has been shown to decrease the likelihood of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women with symptomatic cervical polyps. Therefore, performing cervical polypectomy via vaginoscopy without anesthesia provide a feasible and optimal ways in the management of this population.
本研究旨在评估阴道镜下宫颈息肉切除术在孕妇中的有效性和安全性。
回顾性纳入 2017 年 4 月至 2023 年 4 月期间在北京天坛医院就诊的诊断为宫颈息肉的孕妇。A 组采用无窥器、宫颈钳和麻醉的阴道镜下宫颈息肉切除术,B 组接受保守治疗。分析自然流产、早产、胎膜早破(PROM)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、分娩时机和方式以及新生儿结局。
本研究共纳入 90 例孕妇,其中 48 例行阴道镜下息肉切除术(A 组),42 例行保守治疗(B 组)。基线时,A 组术前阴道出血发生率较高,宫颈息肉直径较大。阴道出血与息肉切除的中位间隔为 3.5 周,A 组中位手术时间为孕 19 周。两组自然流产发生率无统计学差异(4.2%比 4.8%,p=1.000)。然而,A 组早产(4.2%比 21.4%,p=0.030)和胎膜早破(18.8%比 45.2%,p=0.025)的发生率明显低于 B 组。两组分娩时机、分娩方式和新生儿结局无统计学差异。
阴道镜下宫颈息肉切除术可降低有症状宫颈息肉孕妇早产和胎膜早破的风险。因此,在管理这类人群时,不使用麻醉的阴道镜下宫颈息肉切除术是一种可行且优化的方法。