• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概率模型、学习算法和反应变异性:认知发展中的抽样。

Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, and response variability: sampling in cognitive development.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University at Newark, Newark, NJ 07102 USA.

University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Oct;18(10):497-500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.006
PMID:25001609
Abstract

Although probabilistic models of cognitive development have become increasingly prevalent, one challenge is to account for how children might cope with a potentially vast number of possible hypotheses. We propose that children might address this problem by 'sampling' hypotheses from a probability distribution. We discuss empirical results demonstrating signatures of sampling, which offer an explanation for the variability of children's responses. The sampling hypothesis provides an algorithmic account of how children might address computationally intractable problems and suggests a way to make sense of their 'noisy' behavior.

摘要

尽管认知发展的概率模型已经越来越普及,但一个挑战是要解释儿童如何应对潜在的大量可能的假设。我们提出,儿童可以通过从概率分布中“抽样”假设来解决这个问题。我们讨论了证明抽样特征的实证结果,这些结果为儿童反应的可变性提供了解释。抽样假设为儿童如何解决计算上难以处理的问题提供了一种算法解释,并为理解他们的“嘈杂”行为提供了一种方法。

相似文献

1
Probabilistic models, learning algorithms, and response variability: sampling in cognitive development.概率模型、学习算法和反应变异性:认知发展中的抽样。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Oct;18(10):497-500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
2
Rational variability in children's causal inferences: the Sampling Hypothesis.儿童因果推理中的合理变异性:抽样假设。
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):285-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
Rational randomness: the role of sampling in an algorithmic account of preschooler's causal learning.理性随机性:抽样在幼儿因果学习算法解释中的作用。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:161-91. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00006-x.
4
Interactions between causal models, theories, and social cognitive development.因果模型、理论与社会认知发展的相互作用。
Neural Netw. 2010 Oct-Nov;23(8-9):1060-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
5
A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development.贝叶斯认知发展模型教程介绍。
Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):302-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.015. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Bayesian networks, Bayesian learning and cognitive development.贝叶斯网络、贝叶斯学习与认知发展。
Dev Sci. 2007 May;10(3):281-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00584.x.
7
Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning.理性模型的合理逼近:类别学习的替代算法。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1144-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020511.
8
Mechanisms of theory formation in young children.幼儿理论形成的机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.005.
9
Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.赢则保留,输则抽样:一种用于近似贝叶斯推断的简单序贯算法。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Nov;74:35-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Magic Act in Causal Reasoning: Making Markov Violations Disappear.因果推理中的一个神奇行为:让马尔可夫违背消失。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 May 23;27(6):548. doi: 10.3390/e27060548.
2
Understanding learning through uncertainty and bias.通过不确定性和偏差来理解学习。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Feb 13;3(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00203-y.
3
Parents spontaneously scaffold the formation of conversational pacts with their children.父母会自然而然地为与孩子达成对话契约提供支持。
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):546-561. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14186. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
What's in the Box? Preschoolers Consider Ambiguity, Expected Value, and Information for Future Decisions in Explore-Exploit Tasks.盒子里有什么?学龄前儿童在探索-利用任务中考虑模糊性、预期价值和信息以用于未来决策。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Oct 27;7:855-878. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00110. eCollection 2023.
5
The Bayesian Mutation Sampler Explains Distributions of Causal Judgments.贝叶斯突变采样器解释了因果判断的分布。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jun 15;7:318-349. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00080. eCollection 2023.
6
Adaptive search space pruning in complex strategic problems.复杂战略问题中的自适应搜索空间剪枝。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 10;18(8):e1010358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010358. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Spontaneous discovery of novel task solutions in children.儿童对新任务解决方法的自发发现。
PLoS One. 2022 May 31;17(5):e0266253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266253. eCollection 2022.
8
Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.理论先行于检验:如何在心理科学中构建高拟真度的解释性理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):682-697. doi: 10.1177/1745691620970604. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Balancing exploration and exploitation with information and randomization.通过信息与随机化实现探索与利用的平衡。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Apr;38:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
10
Eye movements reflect adaptive predictions and predictive precision.眼球运动反映了适应性预测和预测精度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 May;150(5):915-929. doi: 10.1037/xge0000977. Epub 2020 Oct 12.