Suppr超能文献

慢性病和疼痛背景下补充与替代医学(CAM)使用的代际差异:婴儿潮一代与沉默一代。

Generational differences in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in the context of chronic diseases and pain: baby boomers versus the silent generation.

作者信息

Ho Tiffany F, Rowland-Seymour Anastasia, Frankel Eitan S, Li Susan Q, Mao Jun J

机构信息

From the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (TFH); Division of Internal Medicine (ARS), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore; and Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (ESF, SQL, JJM), Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;27(4):465-73. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.04.130238.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More people are supplementing conventional medicine with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), but studies have not compared CAM use between baby boomers (adults born from 1946 to 1964) and the so-called silent generation (born from 1925 to 1945).

METHODS

This study compares CAM usage between baby boomers (n = 7734) and the silent generation (n = 4682) through secondary analyses of the 2007 National Health Interview Survey data. The analysis also compares chronic disease and pain status. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify generational differences.

RESULTS

Although the silent generation reported twice as many chronic disease (51.3% vs 26.1%; P < .001) and more painful conditions (56.1% vs 52.2%; P < .001), baby boomers were more likely to use CAM within the past year (43.1% vs 35.4%; P < .001). Adjusting for covariates, baby boomers with heart disease, cancer, and diabetes were more likely to use CAM than adults from the silent generation. Chronic pain status was independently associated with greater CAM use (adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-2.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Baby boomers reported significantly higher rates of CAM use than the silent generation for both chronic diseases and painful conditions. Family physicians caring for the aging population must use patient-centered communication about the risks/benefits of CAM, which is necessary to promote effective coping with chronic illnesses and pain.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人在使用传统医学的同时还补充使用补充和替代医学(CAM),但此前的研究尚未比较婴儿潮一代(出生于1946年至1964年的成年人)和所谓的沉默一代(出生于1925年至1945年)之间使用CAM的情况。

方法

本研究通过对2007年美国国家健康访谈调查数据进行二次分析,比较了婴儿潮一代(n = 7734)和沉默一代(n = 4682)使用CAM的情况。该分析还比较了慢性病和疼痛状况。建立了多变量逻辑回归模型以确定代际差异。

结果

尽管沉默一代报告的慢性病(51.3%对26.1%;P <.001)和疼痛状况更多(56.1%对52.2%;P <.001),但婴儿潮一代在过去一年中使用CAM的可能性更高(43.1%对35.4%;P <.001)。在对协变量进行调整后,患有心脏病、癌症和糖尿病的婴儿潮一代比沉默一代的成年人更有可能使用CAM。慢性疼痛状况与更多地使用CAM独立相关(调整后的优势比为2.26;95%置信区间为2.03 - 2.52)。

结论

婴儿潮一代报告称,在慢性病和疼痛状况方面,他们使用CAM的比例显著高于沉默一代。照顾老年人群的家庭医生必须以患者为中心,就CAM的风险/益处进行沟通,这对于促进有效应对慢性病和疼痛是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验