Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China;
Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, Laboratoire d'Anthropologie des Populations Passées et Présentes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux 1, 33405 Talence, France; and.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111(29):10509-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410735111. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
One of the morphological features that has been identified as uniquely derived for the western Eurasian Neandertals concerns the relative sizes and positions of their semicircular canals. In particular, they exhibit a relatively small anterior canal, a relatively larger lateral one, and a more inferior position of the posterior one relative to the lateral one. These discussions have not included full paleontological data on eastern Eurasian Pleistocene human temporal labyrinths, which have the potential to provide a broader context for assessing Pleistocene Homo trait polarities. We present the temporal labyrinths of four eastern Eurasian Pleistocene Homo, one each of Early (Lantian 1), Middle (Hexian 1), and Late (Xujiayao 15) Pleistocene archaic humans and one early modern human (Liujiang 1). The labyrinths of the two earlier specimens and the most recent one conform to the proportions seen among western early and recent modern humans, reinforcing the modern human pattern as generally ancestral for the genus Homo. The labyrinth of Xujiayao 15 is in the middle of the Neandertal variation and separate from the other samples. This eastern Eurasian labyrinthine dichotomy occurs in the context of none of the distinctive Neandertal external temporal or other cranial features. As such, it raises questions regarding possible cranial and postcranial morphological correlates of Homo labyrinthine variation, the use of individual "Neandertal" features for documenting population affinities, and the nature of late archaic human variation across Eurasia.
一个被认为是西方欧亚尼安德特人特有的形态特征是他们的半规管的相对大小和位置。特别是,他们表现出相对较小的前管,相对较大的侧管,以及后管相对于侧管的更下方位置。这些讨论没有包括东亚更新世人类颞骨迷路的完整古生物学数据,这些数据有可能为评估更新世人类特征极性提供更广泛的背景。我们介绍了四个东亚更新世人类的颞骨迷路,分别是早期(蓝田 1 号)、中期(河姆渡 1 号)、晚期(许家窑 15 号)古人类和一个早期现代人(柳江 1 号)。两个早期标本和最近一个标本的迷路符合西方早期和现代人类中所见的比例,强化了现代人模式作为人类属的一般祖先模式。许家窑 15 号的迷路处于尼安德特变异的中间位置,与其他样本分开。这种东亚颞骨二分法的出现与尼安德特人外部颞骨或其他颅骨特征无关。因此,它提出了关于人类迷路变异的可能的颅骨和颅后骨形态相关物、个体“尼安德特人”特征用于记录种群亲缘关系以及欧亚大陆晚期古人类变异的性质的问题。