Molema J, van Herwaarden C L, Folgering H T
Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur Respir J. 1989 Apr;2(4):308-16.
Twenty two allergic patients with bronchial asthma completed this study. Effects of long-term treatment with inhaled cromoglycate 4 x 2 mg.day-1 were compared to the effects of inhaled budesonide 4 x 0.1 mg.day-1 on symptoms, additional beta 2-agonist use, lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness measured by the provocation concentration of histamine producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20 histamine) and exercise-induced fall in FEV1. The study was carried out in a double-blind way with a randomized crossover design using a double-dummy technique. After a single-blind placebo period, the two active treatment periods of 6 weeks were separated by a single-blind placebo period. Symptom score and beta 2-agonist use decreased during both active treatment periods, which showed no mutual differences. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates were significantly higher during treatment with budesonide versus placebo (p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.001), and also versus cromoglycate (p less than 0.02 and p less than 0.05). FEV1 showed improvement after a 6 week treatment with budesonide versus placebo (p less than 0.05), although there was no significant difference between the two active treatments. PC20 histamine did not change during treatment with cromoglycate. Budesonide showed a significant increase in PC20 histamine versus placebo (p less than 0.05) and was marginally significantly better than cromoglycate (p = 0.05). Exercise-induced fall in FEV1 was not changed by cromoglycate, but improved significantly during budesonide in comparison with placebo (p less than 0.01) and also with cromoglycate (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
22名支气管哮喘过敏患者完成了本研究。将吸入色甘酸4×2毫克/天进行长期治疗的效果,与吸入布地奈德4×0.1毫克/天对症状、额外β2激动剂使用、肺功能以及通过组胺激发浓度使一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降20%(组胺PC20)和运动诱发的FEV1下降所测量的支气管高反应性的效果进行比较。该研究采用双盲方式,运用双模拟技术进行随机交叉设计。在单盲安慰剂期后,两个为期6周的活性治疗期被一个单盲安慰剂期隔开。在两个活性治疗期内,症状评分和β2激动剂使用均下降,两者无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,布地奈德治疗期间早晚呼气峰值流速显著更高(p<0.01和p<0.001),与色甘酸相比也更高(p<0.02和p<0.05)。与安慰剂相比,布地奈德治疗6周后FEV1有所改善(p<0.05),尽管两种活性治疗之间无显著差异。色甘酸治疗期间组胺PC20未改变。与安慰剂相比,布地奈德的组胺PC20显著增加(p<0.05),且略优于色甘酸(p = 0.05)。色甘酸未改变运动诱发的FEV1下降,但与安慰剂相比,布地奈德治疗期间显著改善(p<0.01),与色甘酸相比也改善显著(p<0.001)。(摘要截短于250字)