Kozicky Jan-Marie, Torres Ivan J, Silveira Leonardo E, Bond David J, Lam Raymond W, Yatham Lakshmi N
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Room 2C7-2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2A1
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;75(6):e587-93. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08928.
Cognitive impairments are present immediately following recovery from a first episode of mania, although at a lesser severity than those seen in more chronic patients with bipolar I disorder. Little is known about how deficits evolve over the course of illness, however, and whether these changes are associated with disease progression.
Patients with bipolar I disorder (DSM-IV-TR) receiving naturalistic clinical follow-up from the Systematic Treatment Optimization Program for Early Mania (STOP-EM) from July 2004 to May 2013 completed a comprehensive cognitive battery following recovery from their first manic episode and again 1 year later. Performance was compared between patients who experienced a recurrence of a mood episode (BDrecur) (n = 26) versus those that maintained remission (BDwell) (n = 27) over follow-up, as well as healthy comparison subjects (HS) (n = 31).
While both BDrecur and BDwell had impairments in overall cognitive performance relative to HS at baseline (mean difference = -0.59, P < .001; mean difference = -0.43, P < .05, respectively), at follow-up BDrecur showed deficits compared to both HS (mean difference = -0.62, P = .001) and BDwell (mean difference = -0.41, P = .05), with BDwell cognition similar to that in HS (mean difference = -0.21, P > .4). BDwell showed larger improvements over follow-up relative to both other groups (P < .05). While changes in BDrecur did not differ from HS, in this group more days in a manic or hypomanic episode was associated with performance declines (r = -0.40, P < .05).
While cognitive function improves in patients who sustain remission in the year following a first manic episode, those who experience a recurrence remain impaired, with performance declines being most apparent in those who experienced longer manic or hypomanic episodes.
虽然首次躁狂发作恢复后即刻存在认知障碍,但其严重程度低于更慢性的双相I型障碍患者。然而,对于这些缺陷在疾病过程中如何演变以及这些变化是否与疾病进展相关,人们知之甚少。
2004年7月至2013年5月期间,接受早期躁狂系统性治疗优化项目(STOP-EM)自然主义临床随访的双相I型障碍(DSM-IV-TR)患者在首次躁狂发作恢复后完成了一组全面的认知测试,并在1年后再次进行测试。对随访期间经历情绪发作复发的患者(BDrecur)(n = 26)与维持缓解的患者(BDwell)(n = 27)以及健康对照受试者(HS)(n = 31)的测试表现进行了比较。
虽然BDrecur组和BDwell组在基线时相对于HS组在整体认知表现上均有损害(平均差异分别为=-0.59,P <.001;平均差异=-0.43,P <.05),但在随访时,BDrecur组与HS组(平均差异=-0.62,P =.001)和BDwell组(平均差异=-0.41,P =.05)相比均显示出缺陷,而BDwell组的认知与HS组相似(平均差异=-0.21,P >.4)。BDwell组相对于其他两组在随访期间有更大的改善(P <.05)。虽然BDrecur组的变化与HS组没有差异,但在该组中,躁狂或轻躁狂发作天数越多与表现下降相关(r = -0.40,P <.05)。
虽然首次躁狂发作后一年维持缓解的患者认知功能有所改善,但经历复发的患者仍有损害,在经历更长时间躁狂或轻躁狂发作的患者中表现下降最为明显。