• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次血管成形术中股动脉入路与桡动脉入路的比较。ACCEPT注册研究分析。

Femoral versus radial access in primary angioplasty. Analysis of the ACCEPT registry.

作者信息

Andrade Pedro Beraldo de, Andrade Mônica Vieira Athanazio de, Barbosa Robson Alves, Labrunie André, Hernandes Mauro Esteves, Marino Roberto Luiz, Precoma Dalton Bertolim, Sá Francisco Carleial Feijó de, Berwanger Otávio, Piva e Mattos Luiz Alberto

机构信息

Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Santa Casa de Votuporanga, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Jun;102(6):566-70. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140063. Epub 2014 May 27.

DOI:10.5935/abc.20140063
PMID:25004418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4079020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The radial access provides a lower risk of bleeding and vascular complications related to the puncture site in comparison to the femoral access. Recent studies have suggested a reduction in mortality associated with the radial access in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients undergoing primary angioplasty according to the type of arterial access route.

METHODS

From August 2010 to December 2011, 588 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were assessed; they were recruited from 47 centers participating in the ACCEPT registry. Patients were grouped and compared according to the arterial access used for the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61.8 years; 75% were males and 24% had diabetes mellitus. There was no difference between groups as regards the procedure success rate, as well as regards the occurrence of death, reinfarction, or stroke at six months of follow-up. Severe bleeding was reported in 1.1% of the sample analyzed, with no statistical difference related to the access used.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral and radial accesses are equally safe and effective for the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The low rate of cardiovascular events and of hemorrhagic complications reflects the quality of the participating centers and the operators expertise with the use of both techniques.

摘要

背景

与股动脉入路相比,桡动脉入路与穿刺部位相关的出血和血管并发症风险较低。近期研究表明,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者中,桡动脉入路可降低死亡率。

目的

根据动脉入路类型比较接受直接血管成形术患者不良心血管缺血和出血事件的发生率。

方法

2010年8月至2011年12月,对588例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死期间接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者进行评估;他们来自参与ACCEPT注册研究的47个中心。根据手术所使用的动脉入路对患者进行分组并比较。

结果

平均年龄为61.8岁;75%为男性,24%患有糖尿病。在手术成功率以及随访6个月时的死亡、再梗死或中风发生率方面,各分组之间没有差异。在所分析的样本中,1.1%报告发生严重出血,与所使用的入路无关,无统计学差异。

结论

股动脉和桡动脉入路在进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时同样安全有效。心血管事件和出血并发症的低发生率反映了参与中心的质量以及术者使用这两种技术的专业水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c18d/4079020/3cce875a3204/abc-102-06-0566-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c18d/4079020/3cce875a3204/abc-102-06-0566-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c18d/4079020/3cce875a3204/abc-102-06-0566-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Femoral versus radial access in primary angioplasty. Analysis of the ACCEPT registry.初次血管成形术中股动脉入路与桡动脉入路的比较。ACCEPT注册研究分析。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Jun;102(6):566-70. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140063. Epub 2014 May 27.
2
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
3
Access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: radial vs. femoral--a prospective, randomised clinical trial (OCEAN RACE).ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的入路:桡动脉与股动脉——一项前瞻性随机临床试验(OCEAN RACE)
Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(7):604-11. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0071. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial.多中心随机临床试验中经桡动脉或股动脉途径治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:STEMI-RADIAL 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 18;63(10):964-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1651. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
6
Radial versus femoral access for angioplasty of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction with second-generation drug-eluting stents.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Jan;68(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死且无心源性休克患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉与股动脉入路的应用及结果:来自ALKK经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86 Suppl 1:S8-14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25987. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Radial primary percutaneous coronary intervention is independently associated with decreased long-term mortality in high-risk ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.对于高危ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,桡动脉入路的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与长期死亡率降低独立相关。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Mar;16(3):170-7. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000230.
9
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management: A prespecified subgroup analysis from VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者桡动脉与股动脉入路:来自 VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART 的预先指定亚组分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Sep;8(6):510-519. doi: 10.1177/2048872618817217. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.血管闭合装置与桡动脉入路在降低非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者穿刺部位并发症方面的比较:急性冠状动脉综合征试验中血管封堵器与桡动脉入路的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):976-982. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26689. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed at a hospital in Southern Brazil.在巴西南部一家医院进行的经皮冠状动脉介入手术。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Aug 15;10(3):164-173. eCollection 2020.
2
Vascular complications in patients who underwent endovascular cardiac procedures: multicenter cohort study.接受心内血管介入手术患者的血管并发症:多中心队列研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Oct 11;26:e3060. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2672.3060.
3
Analysis of safety outcomes for radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention from a large clinical registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Best practices for transradial angiography and intervention: a consensus statement from the society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention's transradial working group.桡动脉血管造影和介入治疗的最佳实践:心血管造影和介入学会桡动脉工作组的共识声明
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;83(2):228-36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25209. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
2
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
3
基于大型临床注册研究对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路安全性结局的分析。
Open Heart. 2016 Aug 3;3(2):e000397. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000397. eCollection 2016.
4
Bees for development: Brazilian survey reveals how to optimize stingless beekeeping.为发展养蜂业:巴西调查揭示如何优化无刺蜂养殖。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0121157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121157. eCollection 2015.
5
Primary angioplasty in the ACCEPT registry: Why has it been difficult to accept and implement the radial artery access as preferential?ACCEPT注册研究中的直接血管成形术:为何难以接受并将桡动脉入路作为首选实施?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Oct;103(4):268-71. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140154.
Prognostic value of access and non-access sites bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接触和非接触部位出血的预后价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):354-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000433. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
ST-Elevation myocardial infarction network: systematization in 205 cases reduced clinical events in the public health care system.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死网络:205 例的系统化管理降低了公共医疗体系中的临床事件发生率。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Nov;99(5):1040-8. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012005000100. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
5
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理的欧洲心脏病学会指南
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
6
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照在 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的研究:RIFLE-STEACS(ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照研究)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
7
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及心血管造影和介入学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
Major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Nov;23(11):485-90.
9
Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.心血管临床试验的标准化出血定义:出血学术研究联盟的共识报告。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449.
10
Rationality and methods of ACCEPT registry - Brazilian registry of clinical practice in acute coronary syndromes of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.ACCEPT 注册研究的合理性和方法——巴西心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征临床实践巴西注册研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Aug;97(2):94-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000064. Epub 2011 May 20.