• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在行动选择中对概率而非负值的偏好。

The preference of probability over negative values in action selection.

作者信息

Neyedli Heather F, Welsh Timothy N

机构信息

a Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(2):261-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.942674. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2014.942674
PMID:25004846
Abstract

It has previously been found that when participants are presented with a pair of motor prospects, they can select the prospect with the largest maximum expected gain (MEG). Many of those decisions, however, were trivial because of large differences in MEG between the prospects. The purpose of the present study was to explore participants' preferences when making non-trivial decisions between two motor prospects. Participants were presented with pairs of prospects that: 1) differed in MEG with either only the values or only the probabilities differing between the prospects; and 2) had similar MEG with one prospect having a larger probability of hitting the target and a higher penalty value and the other prospect a smaller probability of hitting the target but a lower penalty value. In different experiments, participants either had 400 ms or 2000 ms to decide between the prospects. It was found that participants chose the configuration with the larger MEG more often when the probability varied between prospects than when the value varied. In pairs with similar MEGs, participants preferred a larger probability of hitting the target over a smaller penalty value. These results indicate that participants prefer probability information over negative value information in a motor selection task.

摘要

此前已经发现,当向参与者呈现一对运动前景时,他们能够选择具有最大预期收益(MEG)的前景。然而,由于前景之间MEG的差异很大,许多这样的决策都很简单。本研究的目的是探讨参与者在两个运动前景之间做出非简单决策时的偏好。向参与者呈现的前景对具有以下特点:1)MEG不同,前景之间仅在数值或概率上有所不同;2)MEG相似,一个前景击中目标的概率较大且惩罚值较高,另一个前景击中目标的概率较小但惩罚值较低。在不同的实验中,参与者有400毫秒或2000毫秒的时间在前景之间做出决定。结果发现,当概率在前景之间变化时,参与者比当数值变化时更频繁地选择具有较大MEG的配置。在MEG相似的配对中,参与者更喜欢击中目标的概率较大而不是惩罚值较小。这些结果表明,在运动选择任务中,参与者更喜欢概率信息而不是负值信息。

相似文献

1
The preference of probability over negative values in action selection.在行动选择中对概率而非负值的偏好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(2):261-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.942674. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
2
Choices in a key press decision-making task are more optimal after gaining both aiming and reward experience.在按键决策任务中,在获得瞄准和奖励经验后,选择会更加优化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):2197-2216. doi: 10.1177/1747021820940620. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Optimal weighting of costs and probabilities in a risky motor decision-making task requires experience.在风险驾驶决策任务中,对成本和概率进行最优权衡需要经验。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):638-45. doi: 10.1037/a0030518. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
People are better at maximizing expected gain in a manual aiming task with rapidly changing probabilities than with rapidly changing payoffs.人们在一个快速变化概率的手动瞄准任务中比在快速变化收益的任务中更善于最大化预期收益。
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;111(5):1016-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00163.2013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Are perceptuo-motor decisions really more optimal than cognitive decisions?感知运动决策真的比认知决策更优化吗?
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):397-416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.009. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
6
Decisions under risk in Parkinson's disease: preserved evaluation of probability and magnitude.帕金森病中的风险决策:概率和幅度的评估得以保留。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2679-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
7
Prospect evaluation as a function of numeracy and probability denominator.作为计算能力和概率分母函数的前景评估
Cognition. 2015 May;138:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
Sensitivity and bias in decision-making under risk: evaluating the perception of reward, its probability and value.风险决策中的敏感性和偏差:评估奖励的感知、其概率和价值。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033460. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
9
Biases and optimality of sensory-motor and cognitive decisions.感觉运动和认知决策的偏差与最优性
Prog Brain Res. 2009;174:267-78. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01321-1.
10
Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.当赌博以相对频率呈现时,偏好反转现象会减少。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Sep;59(9):1516-23. doi: 10.1080/17470210600750509.

引用本文的文献

1
No one knows what attention is.没有人知道注意力是什么。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2288-2303. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01846-w.
2
Threat affects risk preferences in movement decision making.威胁会影响运动决策中的风险偏好。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;9:150. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00150. eCollection 2015.