Suppr超能文献

[特异性免疫疗法]

[Specific immunotherapy].

作者信息

Grundmann S A, Mosters P, Brehler R

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149, Münster, Deutschland,

出版信息

Hautarzt. 2014 Jul;65(7):633-45; quiz 646-7. doi: 10.1007/s00105-014-2817-0.

Abstract

SCIT (subcutaneous immunotherapy) and SLIT (sublingual immunotherapy) are the only routinely available therapies, which modify allergic diseases sustainably. The ongoing reduction of symptoms and the lower need of symptomatic medication are able to improve the quality of life over a long period of time. However, allergic patients are underprovided due to low use of SIT (specific immunotherapy). After thorough diagnostic workup, the indication has to be checked carefully especially in patients with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma, to insure that SIT is standard therapy. Allergen extracts are manufacturer-specific preparations, therefore their effects cannot be compared directly, just as SCIT and SLIT efficacy cannot be compared directly. In general, preparations with proven efficacy and safety profile should be preferred. Allergens listed in the TAV (Therapeutic Allergen Regulation) fulfill these requirements. However, it is important to ensure adherence for 3 years of therapy, independent of the route of application. SIT has proven socioeconomic benefit already after a short time of therapy.

摘要

皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)和舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)是目前仅有的常规可用疗法,它们能够持续改善过敏性疾病。症状的持续减轻以及对症药物需求的降低能够长期提高生活质量。然而,由于特异性免疫疗法(SIT)的使用率较低,过敏患者未得到充分治疗。在进行全面的诊断检查后,尤其是对于过敏性鼻炎和过敏性哮喘患者,必须仔细检查适应症,以确保SIT是标准治疗方法。变应原提取物是特定厂家的制剂,因此它们的效果无法直接比较,就如同SCIT和SLIT的疗效也无法直接比较一样。一般来说,应优先选择具有已证实疗效和安全性的制剂。治疗性变应原法规(TAV)中列出 的变应原符合这些要求。然而,重要的是要确保无论采用何种给药途径,都要坚持治疗3年。SIT在短时间治疗后已证明具有社会经济效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验