LaCroix Jessica M, Snyder Leslie B, Huedo-Medina Tania B, Johnson Blair T
*Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; †Center for Health, Intervention, and Prevention, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; ‡Department of Communication, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT and Center for Health Communication and Marketing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; §Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 15;66 Suppl 3:S329-40. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000230.
This meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize evaluations of mass media-delivered HIV prevention interventions, assess the effectiveness of interventions in improving condom use and HIV-related knowledge, and identify moderators of effectiveness.
We systematically searched electronic databases, relevant Web sites, related journals, and reference lists of previous reviews and included studies. Studies that quantitatively evaluated the effectiveness of mass media-delivered HIV prevention using pre-/post-campaign assessments, targeted the general population, reported outcomes of interest, and were available as of September 30, 2013 were eligible for inclusion.
Raters coded report, intervention, and sample characteristics. The standardized mean difference, d, comparing pretest and posttest assessments was calculated for each study sample. Effect sizes were analyzed incorporating random-effects assumptions.
Of the 433 obtained and screened reports, 54 reports containing evaluations of 72 interventions using 93 samples (N = 142,196) met the selection criteria and were included. Campaigns were associated with increases in condom use [d+ = 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18 to 0.21], transmission knowledge (d+ = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.41), and prevention knowledge (d+ = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.52). Increases in condom use were larger for longer campaigns and in nations that scored lower on the human development index. Increases in transmission knowledge were larger to the extent that respondents reported greater campaign exposure, for more recent campaigns, and for nations that scored lower on the human development index.
Mass media interventions may be useful in reducing global HIV/AIDS disparities because of their reach and effectiveness.
开展此项荟萃分析以综合大众媒体传播的艾滋病预防干预措施的评估,评估干预措施在提高避孕套使用和艾滋病相关知识方面的有效性,并确定有效性的调节因素。
我们系统检索了电子数据库、相关网站、相关期刊以及既往综述和纳入研究的参考文献列表。使用活动前/后评估对大众媒体传播的艾滋病预防有效性进行定量评估、针对普通人群、报告感兴趣的结果且截至2013年9月30日可获取的研究符合纳入标准。
评分者对报告、干预措施和样本特征进行编码。为每个研究样本计算比较预测试和后测试评估的标准化均数差值d。纳入随机效应假设分析效应量。
在获取并筛选的433份报告中,54份包含对72项干预措施使用93个样本(N = 142,196)的评估符合选择标准并被纳入。活动与避孕套使用增加相关[d+ = 0.25,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.18至0.21]、传播知识增加(d+ = 0.30,95% CI = 0.18至0.41)以及预防知识增加(d+ = 0.39,95% CI = 0.25至0.52)。对于持续时间更长的活动以及人类发展指数得分较低的国家,避孕套使用的增加幅度更大。传播知识的增加幅度在受访者报告活动曝光度更高、活动更新以及人类发展指数得分较低的国家更大。
大众媒体干预措施因其覆盖面和有效性,可能有助于减少全球艾滋病病毒/艾滋病差异。