Taunton Michael J, Mason J Bohannon, Odum Susan M, Springer Bryan D
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
OrthoCarolina, 2001 Vail Ave., Charlotte, NC 28207.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):169-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.051. Epub 2014 May 25.
This study sought to prospectively examine the clinical and radiographic differences between direct anterior (DA-THA) and mini-posterior approach total hip arthroplasty (MPA-THA). Fifty-four patients were prospectively randomized to either MPA or DA-THA. Patient recorded diaries were collected. Radiographs were reviewed. SF-36, WOMAC and HHS scores were tabulated. Time to ambulation without any assistive device favored DA-THA (22 vs. 28 days, P=0.04). Three week SF mental scores favored MPA-THA (60.66 vs. 58.43, P=0.01). In a randomized prospective trial, patients undergoing DA-THA voluntarily quit use of all walking aids on average 6 days earlier than patients with a MPA-THA. Little additional clinical or radiographic benefit was seen between the cohorts.
本研究旨在前瞻性地探讨直接前路(DA-THA)与微创后路全髋关节置换术(MPA-THA)在临床和影像学方面的差异。54例患者被前瞻性随机分为MPA组或DA-THA组。收集患者记录的日记。复查X线片。汇总SF-36、WOMAC和HHS评分。无需任何辅助装置即可行走的时间,DA-THA组更具优势(22天对28天,P = 0.04)。术后三周的SF精神评分,MPA-THA组更具优势(60.66对58.43,P = 0.01)。在一项随机前瞻性试验中,接受DA-THA的患者平均比接受MPA-THA的患者提前6天自愿停止使用所有助行器。两组之间未见明显额外的临床或影像学益处。