Mograbi Daniel C, Ferri Cleusa P, Stewart Robert, Sosa Ana L, Brown Richard G, Laks Jerson, Morris Robin G
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Section of Epidemiology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo - Department of Psychobiology, Sao Paulo, Brazil Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz - Institute of Health Education and Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2015 Mar;28(1):3-11. doi: 10.1177/0891988714541868. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
This study investigated in a community sample associations of 2 different measures of unawareness of memory impairment in dementia with cognitive variables and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Design--cross-sectional, population-based survey. Settings--community samples (n = 15 022) from 3 world regions (Latin America, China, and India). Participants--829 people with dementia identified from standardized interviews and diagnostic algorithms. Measurements--unawareness of memory deficits was measured in 2 ways: comparison of participant subjective report with either objective performance on memory tests or informant report (IR). Associations were investigated using prevalence ratios and Poisson regressions. Differences in frequency of unawareness were explored with McNemar tests for each region and agreement between variables calculated with Cohen κ.
The unawareness variable based on comparison with performance was associated with cognitive variables, such as fluency (in China) and visuospatial impairments (Latin America and India), and behavioral symptoms, such as mania (Latin America) and hallucinations (China). The unawareness variable based on IR was associated only with behavioral symptoms, such as anxiety (in China and India) and hallucinations and mania (Latin America). Frequency of unawareness was significantly higher in the unawareness variable based on performance in India. Agreement between the 2 unawareness variables was moderate in Latin America and China but only slight in India.
Different ways of measuring unawareness are differentially associated with influencing factors. Informant-based unawareness measures may be more subjective and less sensitive than variables taking into account actual performance on cognitive tests.
本研究在一个社区样本中调查了痴呆症中两种不同的记忆障碍无意识测量方法与认知变量以及痴呆症的行为和心理症状之间的关联。
设计——横断面、基于人群的调查。设置——来自3个世界地区(拉丁美洲、中国和印度)的社区样本(n = 15022)。参与者——通过标准化访谈和诊断算法识别出的829名痴呆症患者。测量——通过两种方式测量记忆缺陷的无意识:将参与者的主观报告与记忆测试的客观表现或 informant report(IR)进行比较。使用患病率比和泊松回归研究关联。使用 McNemar 检验探索每个地区无意识频率的差异,并使用 Cohen κ计算变量之间的一致性。
基于与表现比较的无意识变量与认知变量相关,如流畅性(在中国)和视觉空间障碍(拉丁美洲和印度),以及行为症状,如躁狂(拉丁美洲)和幻觉(中国)。基于IR的无意识变量仅与行为症状相关,如焦虑(在中国和印度)以及幻觉和躁狂(拉丁美洲)。在印度,基于表现的无意识变量中无意识频率显著更高。在拉丁美洲和中国,两种无意识变量之间的一致性为中等,但在印度仅为轻微。
测量无意识的不同方法与影响因素的关联各不相同。基于 informant 的无意识测量可能比考虑认知测试实际表现的变量更主观且不太敏感。