Department of Human Development, Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00649. eCollection 2014.
Neurobehavioral models of personality suggest that the salience assigned to particular classes of stimuli vary as a function of traits that reflect both the activity of neurobiological encoding and relevant social experience. In turn, this joint influence modulates the extent that salience influences attentional processes, and hence learning about and responding to those stimuli. Applying this model to the domain of social valuation, we assessed the differential effects on attentional guidance by affiliative cues of (i) a higher-order temperament trait (Social Closeness), and (ii) attachment style in a sample of 57 women. Attention to affiliative pictures paired with either incentive or neutral pictures was assessed using camera eye-tracking. Trait social closeness and attachment avoidance interacted to modulate fixation frequency on affiliative but not on incentive pictures, suggesting that both traits influence the salience assigned to affiliative cues specifically.
神经行为人格模型表明，特定类别的刺激的显著性分配是作为反映神经生物学编码活动和相关社会经验的特征的函数而变化的。反过来，这种联合影响调节了显著性影响注意力过程的程度，从而影响了对这些刺激的学习和反应。将该模型应用于社会评估领域，我们评估了在 57 名女性样本中，（i）更高阶的气质特征（社交亲密）和（ii）依恋风格对亲和线索的注意力引导的差异影响。使用相机眼动追踪评估与奖励或中性图片配对的亲和图片的注意力。特质社交亲密和依恋回避相互作用，调节对亲和图片的注视频率，但不调节对奖励图片的注视频率，这表明这两个特征都特别影响对亲和线索的显著性分配。
