Lexchin Joel
Joel Lexchin, MSc, MD, is a Professor in the School of Health Policy and Management at York University, a staff physician in the Emergency Department of the University Health Network, and an Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Open Med. 2014 Jan 28;8(1):e14-9. eCollection 2014.
Studying drugs withdrawn from the market for safety reasons can help in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the pre- and post-market safety evaluation systems. This study considered 2 questions: Has there been a change over time in the percentage of new drugs that are eventually withdrawn because of safety reasons? How long are new drugs on the market before their serious safety problems are recognized?
All drugs approved between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2009 and subsequently withdrawn for safety reasons (until 1 October 2013) were identified, and the generic name, date of approval, and date of withdrawal were recorded. The total number of drugs approved over the same period was obtained from annual Health Canada reports. The percentages of new active substances approved in the 5-year periods 1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004, and 2005-2009 and eventually withdrawn were compared using the χ(2) test. The time between approval and withdrawal was calculated in days.
Of the 528 new drugs approved over the period of interest, a total of 22 (4.2%) were eventually withdrawn. Between 3.9% and 4.4% of the drugs approved in each 5-year period were eventually withdrawn (χ(2) = 0.04, p = 0.99 for difference among 5-year periods). The median time between approval and withdrawal was 1271 days (interquartile range 706-2876).
One explanation for the finding of no difference in the percentage of drugs approved in the four 5-year periods that were eventually withdrawn is the lack of any change in the rigour of the premarket evaluation system and the postmarket surveillance systems. The 1271-day median time between Notice of Compliance and withdrawal emphasizes the need to be particularly cautious in prescribing new drugs early in their life cycle.
研究因安全原因退出市场的药物有助于评估上市前和上市后安全评估系统的优缺点。本研究考虑了两个问题:最终因安全原因退出的新药百分比是否随时间发生了变化?新药在出现严重安全问题之前在市场上销售了多长时间?
确定了1990年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间批准并随后因安全原因退出(截至2013年10月1日)的所有药物,并记录了通用名、批准日期和退出日期。同期批准的药物总数来自加拿大卫生部的年度报告。使用χ(2)检验比较了1990 - 1994年、1995 - 1999年、2000 - 2004年和2005 - 2009年这四个5年期间批准的新活性物质最终退出的百分比。批准与退出之间的时间以天为单位计算。
在感兴趣的时间段内批准的528种新药中,共有22种(4.2%)最终退出。每个5年期间批准的药物中有3.9%至4.4%最终退出(χ(2)=0.04,5年期间之间的差异p = 0.99)。批准与退出之间的中位时间为1271天(四分位间距706 - 2876)。
在四个5年期间批准的最终退出药物百分比没有差异这一发现的一个解释是上市前评估系统和上市后监测系统的严格程度没有任何变化。合规通知与退出之间1271天的中位时间强调了在新药生命周期早期开处方时需要格外谨慎。