Suppr超能文献

新药有多安全?1990年至2009年间在加拿大获批的药物的市场撤市情况。

How safe are new drugs? Market withdrawal of drugs approved in Canada between 1990 and 2009.

作者信息

Lexchin Joel

机构信息

Joel Lexchin, MSc, MD, is a Professor in the School of Health Policy and Management at York University, a staff physician in the Emergency Department of the University Health Network, and an Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Open Med. 2014 Jan 28;8(1):e14-9. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studying drugs withdrawn from the market for safety reasons can help in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the pre- and post-market safety evaluation systems. This study considered 2 questions: Has there been a change over time in the percentage of new drugs that are eventually withdrawn because of safety reasons? How long are new drugs on the market before their serious safety problems are recognized?

METHODS

All drugs approved between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2009 and subsequently withdrawn for safety reasons (until 1 October 2013) were identified, and the generic name, date of approval, and date of withdrawal were recorded. The total number of drugs approved over the same period was obtained from annual Health Canada reports. The percentages of new active substances approved in the 5-year periods 1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004, and 2005-2009 and eventually withdrawn were compared using the χ(2) test. The time between approval and withdrawal was calculated in days.

RESULTS

Of the 528 new drugs approved over the period of interest, a total of 22 (4.2%) were eventually withdrawn. Between 3.9% and 4.4% of the drugs approved in each 5-year period were eventually withdrawn (χ(2) = 0.04, p = 0.99 for difference among 5-year periods). The median time between approval and withdrawal was 1271 days (interquartile range 706-2876).

INTERPRETATION

One explanation for the finding of no difference in the percentage of drugs approved in the four 5-year periods that were eventually withdrawn is the lack of any change in the rigour of the premarket evaluation system and the postmarket surveillance systems. The 1271-day median time between Notice of Compliance and withdrawal emphasizes the need to be particularly cautious in prescribing new drugs early in their life cycle.

摘要

背景

研究因安全原因退出市场的药物有助于评估上市前和上市后安全评估系统的优缺点。本研究考虑了两个问题:最终因安全原因退出的新药百分比是否随时间发生了变化?新药在出现严重安全问题之前在市场上销售了多长时间?

方法

确定了1990年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间批准并随后因安全原因退出(截至2013年10月1日)的所有药物,并记录了通用名、批准日期和退出日期。同期批准的药物总数来自加拿大卫生部的年度报告。使用χ(2)检验比较了1990 - 1994年、1995 - 1999年、2000 - 2004年和2005 - 2009年这四个5年期间批准的新活性物质最终退出的百分比。批准与退出之间的时间以天为单位计算。

结果

在感兴趣的时间段内批准的528种新药中,共有22种(4.2%)最终退出。每个5年期间批准的药物中有3.9%至4.4%最终退出(χ(2)=0.04,5年期间之间的差异p = 0.99)。批准与退出之间的中位时间为1271天(四分位间距706 - 2876)。

解读

在四个5年期间批准的最终退出药物百分比没有差异这一发现的一个解释是上市前评估系统和上市后监测系统的严格程度没有任何变化。合规通知与退出之间1271天的中位时间强调了在新药生命周期早期开处方时需要格外谨慎。

相似文献

4
Drug Withdrawal Due to Safety: A Review of the Data Supporting Withdrawal Decision.
Curr Drug Saf. 2020;15(1):4-12. doi: 10.2174/1574886314666191004092520.
6
Post-approval safety issues with innovative drugs: a European cohort study.
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1105-15. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0094-y.
7
Classification of nervous system withdrawn and approved drugs with ToxPrint features via machine learning strategies.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Apr;142:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Canadian and US drug approval times and safety considerations.
Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Oct;37(10):1403-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D110.
10
New drug approval times and safety warnings in the United States and Canada, 1992-2011.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(2):e67-81. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

2
Acute cardiovascular effects associated with the use of prescription medications: A Danish nationwide screening study.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul;91(7):1947-1956. doi: 10.1002/bcp.16406. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Equine Pergolide Toxicity: A Case Series.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64265. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64265. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Pharmacovigilance and Appropriate Drug Use.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;12(6):669. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060669.
6
Drug approval status and recommendations for listing on public formularies: a Canadian cohort analysis.
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e018372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018372.
7
Understanding Users in the 'Field' of Medications.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2016 May 6;4(2):19. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy4020019.
8
Pharmacy Student Facilitation of Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Hospital.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;70(4):276-280. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v70i4.1677. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Medicines Save, Medicines Kill.
Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;40(6):457-459. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0521-6.

本文引用的文献

1
New drug approval times and safety warnings in the United States and Canada, 1992-2011.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(2):e67-81. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
2
New drugs and safety: what happened to new active substances approved in Canada between 1995 and 2010?
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 26;172(21):1680-1. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4444.
3
Additional safety risk to exceptionally approved drugs in Europe?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;72(3):490-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03995.x.
4
Examination of the relationship between oncology drug labeling revision frequency and FDA product categorization.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1693-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.141010. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
6
Drug withdrawals from the Canadian market for safety reasons, 1963-2004.
CMAJ. 2005 Mar 15;172(6):765-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.045021.
7
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
8
Adverse drug event monitoring at the Food and Drug Administration.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):57-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20130.x.
9
Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications.
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2215-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2215.
10
Adverse drug reaction reporting--1999.
CMAJ. 2000 Apr 4;162(7):1044, 1048.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验