• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼吁合作:试用智能手机以发现用户与设备之间的差异。

Calling for collaboration: piloting smartphones to discover differences between users and devices.

作者信息

Nagler Alisa, Schlueter Joanne, Johnson Constance, Griffith Brian, Prewitt Judy, Sloane Richard, Adams Martha

机构信息

a Graduate Medical Education , Duke University Hospital , Durham , North Carolina , USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):258-65. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.910461.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2014.910461
PMID:25010237
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare technologies and patient care have evolved rapidly. Healthcare communication techniques and technologies have lagged.

PURPOSES

This pilot study was conducted at Duke University Hospital to investigate the benefits of using smartphones among healthcare team members to promote efficient and effective patient care.

METHODS

This study used a pre-post implementation survey with an educational intervention. Teams (physicians, patient resource managers, physician assistants, and nurses) from medicine and surgery were randomly assigned a smartphone. A validated 28-question survey was used to assess user experience (7-point Likert scale, with 7 indicating more reliable, strongly agree, and faster). Participants were encouraged to attend focus groups to provide feedback on survey content and overall experience. Facilitators used guiding questions and transcripts were used for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine matched pre- and postsurveys were analyzed. Postimplementation data results declined for a majority of items, although remained favorable. This suggests the reality of smartphone use did not live up to expectations but was still considered an improvement over the current paging system. Differences by device and user were found, such as the iPhone being easier to use and the BlackBerry more professional; nonphysicians were more concerned about training and the sterility of the device. Themes elicited from focus groups included challenges of the current paging system, text message content, device ease of use and utility, service coverage, and professionalism.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants in this study recognized the benefit of using smartphones to reach team members in a timely and convenient manner while having access to beneficial applications. Lessons were learned for future implementations with more favorable experiences for participants. Perhaps most striking was the shared acknowledgment that the current system doesn't work well and an understanding of why.

摘要

背景

医疗技术和患者护理发展迅速。而医疗沟通技术却滞后了。

目的

本试点研究在杜克大学医院开展,旨在调查医疗团队成员使用智能手机对促进高效和有效的患者护理的益处。

方法

本研究采用实施前-后的调查并进行教育干预。来自内科和外科的团队(医生、患者资源管理人员、医师助理和护士)被随机分配一部智能手机。使用经过验证的28个问题的调查问卷来评估用户体验(7点李克特量表,7表示更可靠、强烈同意以及更快)。鼓励参与者参加焦点小组,以就调查内容和总体体验提供反馈。主持人使用引导性问题,并将文字记录用于定性分析。

结果

分析了89份匹配的调查前和调查后问卷。尽管实施后的数据结果对大多数项目有所下降,但仍保持良好。这表明智能手机的实际使用情况未达预期,但仍被认为比当前的传呼系统有所改进。发现了设备和用户之间的差异,例如iPhone更易于使用,黑莓更具专业性;非医生更关心培训和设备的无菌性。焦点小组得出的主题包括当前传呼系统的挑战、短信内容、设备易用性和实用性、服务覆盖范围以及专业性。

结论

本研究的参与者认识到使用智能手机能及时、方便地联系团队成员并能使用有益应用程序的好处。为未来的实施吸取了经验教训,以使参与者有更良好的体验。或许最引人注目的是大家共同承认当前系统运行不佳以及对其原因的理解。

相似文献

1
Calling for collaboration: piloting smartphones to discover differences between users and devices.呼吁合作:试用智能手机以发现用户与设备之间的差异。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(3):258-65. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.910461.
2
The use of smartphones for clinical communication on internal medicine wards.智能手机在内科病房临床沟通中的应用。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(9):553-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.775.
3
Bringing technology to the bedside: using smartphones to improve interprofessional communication.将技术应用于床边护理:利用智能手机改善跨专业沟通。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Jul;32(7):305-11. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000063.
4
Educational impact of using smartphones for clinical communication on general medicine: more global, less local.使用智能手机进行临床沟通对全科医学教育的影响:更全球化,更少本土化。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jul;8(7):365-72. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2037. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Communication with patients and colleagues.与患者及同事的沟通。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4359.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
7
Improving communication in level 1 trauma centers: replacing pagers with smartphones.提高 1 级创伤中心的沟通水平:用智能手机取代传呼机。
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Mar;19(3):150-4. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0114. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
A pilot for understanding interdisciplinary teams in rehabilitation practice.一项关于理解康复实践中跨学科团队的试点研究。
Rehabil Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):142-52. doi: 10.1002/rnj.75.
9
Resident use of the Internet, e-mail, and personal electronics in the care of surgical patients.住院医师在外科患者护理中使用互联网、电子邮件和个人电子设备的情况。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):215-23. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011646.
10
Collaboration, credibility, compassion, and coordination: professional nurse communication skill sets in health care team interactions.协作、可信度、同情心与协调:医疗团队互动中的专业护士沟通技能组合
J Prof Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;22(3):180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-Led Telephone Follow-Up Intervention for Titrating and Tapering Opioids in Chronic Pain Patients - A Feasibility Study.护士主导的慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物滴定和减量的电话随访干预——一项可行性研究
J Pain Res. 2023 Apr 17;16:1285-1300. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S394878. eCollection 2023.
2
Using mobile devices for inpatient rounding and handoffs: an innovative application developed and rapidly adopted by clinicians in a pediatric hospital.使用移动设备进行住院患者查房和交接班:一家儿童医院的临床医生开发并迅速采用的创新应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e69-e78. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw107.
3
An App to Support Difficult Interactions Among Providers, Patients, and Families.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015 Sep-Oct;6(5):481-5. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2015.6.5.8. Epub 2015 Sep 1.