White D G, Collins P O, Rowsell R B
Public Health Laboratory, Royal United Hospital (North), Bath, U.K.
J Infect. 1989 May;18(3):221-9. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(89)80058-1.
A total of 413 eligible patients took part in an observer-blind randomised multicentre clinical trial in order to compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of mupirocin (Bactroban) ointment with sodium fusidate (Fucidin) ointment for treating superficial skin infections seen in general practice. Mupirocin was applied twice daily and sodium fusidate thrice daily for a period of 7 days. Both treatments were similarly effective with 97% patients treated with mupirocin and 93% patients treated with sodium fusidate responding. Mupirocin was significantly more effective in the treatment of acute primary skin infections and in the treatment of a subgroup of patients with impetigo (P less than 0.01). Of the organisms detected before treatment began, 93% were not found after treatment with mupirocin compared with 89% after treatment with sodium fusidate. Staphylococcus aureus and/or beta-haemolytic streptococci appeared to be eliminated in significantly more patients treated with mupirocin (96%) compared with those treated with sodium fusidate (88%), (P = 0.03). Both treatments were well tolerated.
共有413名符合条件的患者参与了一项观察者盲法随机多中心临床试验,以比较莫匹罗星(百多邦)软膏和夫西地酸钠(立思丁)软膏治疗全科医学中常见的浅表皮肤感染的临床和细菌学疗效。莫匹罗星每日涂抹两次,夫西地酸钠每日涂抹三次,持续7天。两种治疗方法同样有效,接受莫匹罗星治疗的患者中有97%有反应,接受夫西地酸钠治疗的患者中有93%有反应。莫匹罗星在治疗急性原发性皮肤感染以及脓疱病患者亚组方面明显更有效(P小于0.01)。在治疗开始前检测到的微生物中,莫匹罗星治疗后93%未被发现,夫西地酸钠治疗后为89%。与接受夫西地酸钠治疗的患者(88%)相比,接受莫匹罗星治疗的患者中金黄色葡萄球菌和/或β溶血性链球菌的清除率明显更高(96%),(P = 0.03)。两种治疗的耐受性都很好。