Weinmann Arndt, Sattler Thomas, Unold Hans-Peter, Grambihler Annette, Teufel Andreas, Koch Sandra, Schuchmann Marcus, Biesterfeld Stefan, Wörns Marcus A, Galle Peter R, Schulze-Bergkamen Henning
*Clinical Registry Unit (CRU) †Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz ‡Department of Surgery **Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Clinic of Heidelberg, Heidelberg §Department of Surgery, Kreuznacher Diakonie Hospital, Bad Kreuznach ∥Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinic of Regensburg, Regensburg ¶Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Konstanz, Konstanz #Department of Pathology, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):438-47. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000176.
The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients and to test the clinical value of various outcome models, such as the Mayo Risk Score (MRS), in a large single-center cohort in Germany.
PBC is a chronic autoimmune liver disease with a female gender predominance and a peak incidence in the fifth decade of life. PBC is characterized by portal inflammation and immune-mediated destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts in liver histology and the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies in the serum of nearly 95% of patients. In 5% to 20% of patients an overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is diagnosed. Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely accepted as the standard medical treatment.
A total of 204 patients with PBC or PBC/AIH were retrospectively analyzed with regard to their clinical, biochemical, serological, and histologic features. PBC was diagnosed on the basis of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria. Specific PBC scores, such as the MRS, the European and the Yale model, as well as nonspecific scores such as the Child-Pugh, the Model for End-stage Liver Disease, and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index score were analyzed for their utility to predict the clinical outcome of patients.
One hundred eighty-four patients with PBC alone and 20 with primary biliary cirrhosis/autoimmune hepatitis overlap were followed up for an average of 7.0 (range, 0.5 to 33.2) years. Importantly, baseline values of serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG, as well as antimitochondrial antibodies titers did not allow in properly predicting patient's outcome. The MRS proved clinical applicability. Patients with an R-value <6 did not develop liver-related complications. The Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index score had a significant correlation with the histologic degree of liver fibrosis, with limited value of scores between 1.0 and 1.5. Patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥8 (n=17) had a significantly higher risk to undergo liver transplantation or liver-related death. Outcome was less favorable than predicted by the European model. All scores showed low positive predictive values, limiting their applicability in clinical practice.
Herein, we demonstrate that clinical risk scores in PBC should be interpreted with care. The MRS proved to be helpful to predict a favorable outcome. Novel approaches to predict outcome are needed to identify patients who may benefit from alternative, intensified treatment regimens.
本研究的目的是评估原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的长期预后,并在德国一个大型单中心队列中测试各种预后模型(如梅奥风险评分(MRS))的临床价值。
PBC是一种慢性自身免疫性肝病,女性多见,发病高峰在50岁左右。PBC的组织学特征为门静脉炎症和免疫介导的肝内胆管破坏,近95%的患者血清中存在抗线粒体抗体。5%至20%的患者被诊断为合并自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的重叠综合征。熊去氧胆酸被广泛接受为标准药物治疗。
对204例PBC或PBC/AIH患者的临床、生化、血清学和组织学特征进行回顾性分析。PBC根据美国肝病研究协会标准诊断。分析了特定的PBC评分,如MRS、欧洲和耶鲁模型,以及非特定评分,如Child-Pugh、终末期肝病模型和天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比率指数评分,以评估其预测患者临床预后的效用。
184例单纯PBC患者和20例原发性胆汁性肝硬化/自身免疫性肝炎重叠患者平均随访7.0年(范围0.5至33.2年)。重要的是,血清胆红素、碱性磷酸酶、免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和IgG的基线值以及抗线粒体抗体滴度不能准确预测患者的预后。MRS证明具有临床适用性。R值<6的患者未发生肝脏相关并发症。天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比率指数评分与肝纤维化的组织学程度显著相关,评分在1.0至1.5之间价值有限。终末期肝病模型评分≥8的患者(n = 17)进行肝移植或肝相关死亡的风险显著更高。预后不如欧洲模型预测的那么好。所有评分的阳性预测值均较低,限制了它们在临床实践中的应用。
在此,我们证明PBC的临床风险评分应谨慎解读。MRS被证明有助于预测良好的预后。需要新的方法来预测预后,以确定可能从替代的强化治疗方案中获益的患者。