Feng Juan, Xu Jia-Min, Fu Hai-Yan, Xie Nan, Bao Wei-Min, Tang Ying-Mei
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650101, Yunnan Province, China.
Department of General Surgery, Yunnan Provincial First People's Hospital, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1774-1783. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1774.
Due to the chronic progressive disease characteristics of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), patients with advanced PBC should not be ignored. Most prognostic score studies have focused on early stage PBC.
To compare the prognostic value of various risk scores in advanced PBC to help PBC patients obtain more monitoring and assessment.
This study considered patients diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization between 2015 and 2021. The clinical stage was primarily middle and late, and patients usually took ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) after diagnosis. The discriminatory performance of the scores was assessed with concordance statistics at baseline and after 1 year of UDCA treatment. Telephone follow-up was conducted to analyze the course and disease-associated outcomes. The follow-up deadline was December 31, 2021. We compared the risk score indexes between those patients who reached a composite end point of death or liver transplantation (LT) and those who remained alive at the deadline. The combined performance of prognostic scores in estimating the risk of death or LT after 1 year of UDCA treatment was assessed using Cox regression analyses. Predictive accuracy was evaluated by comparing predicted and actual survival through Kaplan-Meier analyses.
We included 397 patients who were first diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization and received UDCA treatment; most disease stages were advanced. After an average of 6.4 ± 1.4 years of follow-up, 82 patients had died, and 4 patients had undergone LT. After receiving UDCA treatment for 1 year, the score with the best discrimination performance was the Mayo, with a concordance statistic of 0.740 (95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.791). The albumin-bilirubin, GLOBE, and Mayo scores tended to overestimate transplant-free survival. Comparing 7 years of calibration results showed that the Mayo score was the best model.
The Mayo, GLOBE, UK-PBC, and ALBI scores demonstrated comparable discriminating performance for advanced stage PBC. The Mayo score showed optimal discriminatory performance and excellent predictive accuracy.
由于原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)具有慢性进展性疾病特征,晚期PBC患者不容忽视。大多数预后评分研究都集中在早期PBC。
比较各种风险评分在晚期PBC中的预后价值,以帮助PBC患者获得更多的监测和评估。
本研究纳入了2015年至2021年住院期间诊断为PBC的患者。临床分期主要为中晚期,患者诊断后通常服用熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)。在基线和UDCA治疗1年后,用一致性统计量评估评分的鉴别性能。通过电话随访分析病程和疾病相关结局。随访截止日期为2021年12月31日。我们比较了达到死亡或肝移植(LT)复合终点的患者与截止日期时仍存活的患者之间的风险评分指标。使用Cox回归分析评估UDCA治疗1年后预后评分在估计死亡或LT风险方面的综合性能。通过Kaplan-Meier分析比较预测生存和实际生存情况来评估预测准确性。
我们纳入了397例首次住院诊断为PBC并接受UDCA治疗的患者;大多数疾病分期为晚期。平均随访6.4±1.4年后,82例患者死亡,4例患者接受了LT。接受UDCA治疗1年后,鉴别性能最佳的评分是梅奥评分,一致性统计量为0.740(95%置信区间:0.690-0.791)。白蛋白-胆红素、GLOBE和梅奥评分往往高估了无移植生存情况。比较7年的校准结果表明,梅奥评分是最佳模型。
梅奥、GLOBE、英国PBC和ALBI评分在晚期PBC中表现出可比的鉴别性能。梅奥评分显示出最佳的鉴别性能和出色的预测准确性。