de Souza Janaina Medeiros, Tholl Adriana Dutra, Córdova Fernanda Peixoto, Heidemann Ivonete Teresinha Schülter Buss, Boehs Astrid Eggert, Nitschke Rosane Gonçalves
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Araranguá, SC, Brasil,
Departamento de Enfermagem, UFSC.
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Jul;19(7):2265-76. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014197.10272013.
The scope of this study is to identify what empowerment strategies were addressed for the promotion of health in health research, characterizing them from a socio-critical and post-structuralist standpoint. It involved an Integrative Review conducted in May 2011 of the Medline, Lilacs and SciELO databases. The inclusion criteria were complete research articles, case reports or experience reports, published between 2002 and 2011 in Portuguese, Spanish and English. The research criteria included the key words "empowerment" and "health promotion" (DeCS/BIREME). Twenty articles, which presented strategies of individual and/or social empowerment that were characterized by a socio-critical perspective, were selected. It is considered that some activities, mainly those that included thematic discussion groups, represented a mobilization and empowerment strategy. These included theater, culture circles, community therapy, therapeutic learning workshops, home visits, university extension and social action projects. It is considered that all empowerment strategies are inherently health promotion strategies, but not all health promotion strategies effectively result in empowerment.
本研究的范围是确定在健康研究中为促进健康而采用的赋权策略，并从社会批判和后结构主义的角度对其进行特征描述。它涉及2011年5月对Medline、Lilacs和SciELO数据库进行的综合综述。纳入标准是2002年至2011年期间以葡萄牙语、西班牙语和英语发表的完整研究文章、病例报告或经验报告。研究标准包括关键词“赋权”和“健康促进”（DeCS/BIREME）。选择了20篇文章，这些文章呈现了以社会批判视角为特征的个人和/或社会赋权策略。据认为，一些活动，主要是那些包括主题讨论小组的活动，代表了一种动员和赋权策略。这些活动包括戏剧、文化圈、社区治疗、治疗性学习工作坊、家访、大学推广和社会行动项目。据认为，所有赋权策略本质上都是健康促进策略，但并非所有健康促进策略都能有效地导致赋权。
